
#1
Feb1113, 04:19 PM

P: 19

I've seen in some probability theory books that the classical definition of probability is a probability measure, it seems fairly trivial but what is the proof for this? Wikipedia gives a very brief one using cardinality of sets. Is there any other way?




#2
Feb1113, 07:29 PM

Mentor
P: 16,543

There is no proof. It's a definition. Definitions never have proofs. The only thing you can ask is why this definition is the right one and why it encapsulates our naive understanding of probability. To answer this question, you need to work out some examples of probability spaces. For example, take two dice and throw them. Describe the probability space and see if the theory matches the experiment.




#3
Feb1313, 01:24 PM

P: 239

One is Kolmogorov's axiomatic approach, as you mentioned in the title. Another is Baye's conditional approach...which is a different measure than the classical one.




#4
Feb1313, 02:26 PM

P: 19

Classical definition of probability & kolmogorovs axioms
oh okay, so you prove that it obeys the axioms by kolmogorov?




#5
Feb1413, 01:40 AM

P: 239





#6
Feb1413, 07:48 AM

P: 519

Using fairly basic set theory principals and Kolmogorov's 3 basic axioms you can prove/create more postulates (much like the Euclidian approach to geometry). Then from there you can show how and why things in classical probability work the way they do. You can also state Bayes laws in terms of Kolomogorov axioms. Dave K 



#7
Feb1413, 10:21 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 3,172





#8
Feb1413, 10:46 AM

Mentor
P: 14,433

Yes, there is a dispute between frequentists and Bayesianists over the meaning and validity of prior probabilities, but that's a debate over interpretations of probability, not over fundamentals. 



#9
Feb1413, 12:25 PM

P: 239

What I really intended to mean is, through Bayes' approach we (first) had the taste of having a different probability measure than the classical approach. More than a century later we again had another probability measure due to Kolmogorov, differing from the classical one. Historically, Bayes' stood alone for many years fighting(!) with the classical. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Classical version of QM axioms  General Physics  2  
what is normally meant by quantizing a classical theory, versus Hardy's axioms  Quantum Physics  4  
Prove using three basic probability axioms  Introductory Physics Homework  2  
Axioms of probability  Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics  13  
Axioms of Probability  Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics  3 