Thread Closed

measure of the reals

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Feb13-13, 05:12 AM   #1
 

measure of the reals


I was reading a little about measure theory, and the measure of a singleton is zero.
So why couldn't we just describe the reals as an uncountable number of singletons which each have zero measure and then union all of these singletons.
Maybe the union only works for countable sets when talking about measure.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
mathematics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Mathematicians analyze social divisions using cell phone data
>> Can math models of gaming strategies be used to detect terrorism networks?
>> Mathematician proves there are infinitely many pairs of prime numbers less than 70 million units apart
Feb13-13, 07:26 AM   #2
 
You are trying to apply the principle that the measure of a disjoint union is the sum of the measures of the components, right?

How do you define the sum of an uncountable set of numbers?
Feb13-13, 07:35 AM   #3
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Literally looking 5 seconds at the wikipedia page on measure theory answers your questions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_theory

Please do some research yourself before asking questions.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: measure of the reals
Thread Forum Replies
Multiplicative groups of nonzero reals and pos. reals Linear & Abstract Algebra 0
Measure Theory-Lebesguq Measure Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Measure Theory - The completion of R^2 under a point mass measure Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
|P(N)| = |Reals| Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Find all reals: General Math 11