|Feb13-13, 05:12 AM||#1|
measure of the reals
I was reading a little about measure theory, and the measure of a singleton is zero.
So why couldn't we just describe the reals as an uncountable number of singletons which each have zero measure and then union all of these singletons.
Maybe the union only works for countable sets when talking about measure.
|Feb13-13, 07:26 AM||#2|
You are trying to apply the principle that the measure of a disjoint union is the sum of the measures of the components, right?
How do you define the sum of an uncountable set of numbers?
|Similar Threads for: measure of the reals|
|Multiplicative groups of nonzero reals and pos. reals||Linear & Abstract Algebra||0|
|Measure Theory-Lebesguq Measure||Calculus & Beyond Homework||1|
|Measure Theory - The completion of R^2 under a point mass measure||Calculus & Beyond Homework||1|
||P(N)| = |Reals|||Calculus & Beyond Homework||1|
|Find all reals:||General Math||11|