Register to reply 
Why is a matrix singular if the determinant is zero? 
Share this thread: 
#1
Feb313, 05:09 PM

P: 13

I'm looking for the deeper meaning behind this law/theorem/statement (I don't know what it is, please correct me). My textbook just told us a matrix is not invertible if the determinant is zero.



#2
Feb313, 05:22 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,148

hi brownman!
an nxn matrix is a linear transformation on ℝ^{n} to itself its determinant is the ratio of the ndimensional volume of the image of a box to the volume of the box itself if the determinant is 0, the image of the box is flattened by at least one dimension (because its volume is 0), so the transformation obviously isn't invertible (it isn't onetoone) if the determinant isn't 0, the box isn't flattened, so the transformation can always be reversed 


#3
Feb313, 07:11 PM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,564

It is also true that det(AB)= det(A)det(B). so if det(A)= 0, it is impossible to have AB= I for any matrix B.



#4
Feb413, 03:00 AM

P: 22

Why is a matrix singular if the determinant is zero?
As the determinant is the product of the eigenvalues of a matrix it being zero means at least one of the eigenvalues is zero as well. By definition it follows that Ax = 0x = 0 for some vector x ≠ 0. In case A was invertible we would have (A^1)Ax = 0 meaning x = 0 which contradicts that x ≠ 0 and therefore A is not invertible.



#5
Feb513, 11:50 PM

P: 13

Okay the combined definitions from all of you seem to make a general sort of sense, thank you for the help guys :)



#6
Feb1213, 09:36 AM

P: 24

A definition of the determinant of an n*n matrix as the nvolume spanned by its column vectors gives this result easily. It can also be proved using other definitions with somewhat more hassle.



#7
Feb1413, 12:54 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,716

For instance suppose the two vectors are (5,0) and (3,2) The area of the parallelogram that they span is the height times the base which is 2(the height) x 5(the base). The determinant of the matrix 5 0 3 2 is 5 x 2  3x0. Can you generalize this example? 


#8
Feb1413, 02:57 PM

P: 24




#9
Feb1513, 10:03 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,716

Another way to think about determinates is to think of them as multilinear functions of the rows (or columns) and investigate how this algebraic property is related to computing volumes. The approach leads to the idea of the exterior algebra of a vector space.
Question: Is every alternating multilinear map a determinant? 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Product of singular values = determinant proof  Calculus & Beyond Homework  6  
MatLab Warning: Matrix is singular, close to singular or badly scaled  Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework  1  
Finding determinant given determinant of another matrix  Calculus & Beyond Homework  3  
Singular values of a matrix times a diagonal matrix  Linear & Abstract Algebra  1  
Making a matrix singular, i have to make the determinant 0, why isn't this right?>  Calculus & Beyond Homework  4 