Walter Lewin's riddle


by Nikitin
Tags: lewin, riddle, walter
Nikitin
Nikitin is offline
#1
Feb16-13, 07:07 AM
P: 588
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E185G_JBd7U

At 37:00 he charges a conductor with a dielectric inside, removes the conductor plates and discharges them, and in the end puts them back into position.

Then something "remarkable" happens - when he connects the conductor plates with each-other, a spark is produced. Why did this happen?

------------

Is this because the dielectric is still polarized when he puts back the plates, and thus the plates themselves become charged (by induction) in turn? If not, what is the answer to this riddle?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Sensitive detection method may help impede illicit nuclear trafficking
CERN: World-record current in a superconductor
Beam on target: CEBAF accelerator achieves 12 GeV commissioning milestone
jfgobin
jfgobin is offline
#2
Feb16-13, 07:54 AM
P: 90
You're on the right track. If you want to put some math on it, consider the simpler case of a plane capacitor, with a dielectric and two gaps. Calculate the field both in the gaps and in the dielectric needed to have a potential difference around 20kV between the two plates, and compare to the breakdown field for air (around 3MV/m)
DrZoidberg
DrZoidberg is offline
#3
Feb16-13, 08:02 PM
P: 370
Walter Lewin explains how this works here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZOaVXmK5zk#t=32m55s

atyy
atyy is offline
#4
Feb16-13, 08:38 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 8,003

Walter Lewin's riddle


How did he discover this?
vanhees71
vanhees71 is offline
#5
Feb17-13, 03:58 AM
Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 2,131
This is marvelous! I could listen to this guy the whole day :-)).


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is MIT Prof. Lewin wrong about Kirchhoff's law? Classical Physics 347
Question about this problem and Walter Lewin's video Introductory Physics Homework 10
Prof. Walter Lewin's best lines ;) General Discussion 5
MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun) General Physics 13
Kirchhoff's 2nd law wrongly used or not? Lewin vs all college books General Physics 6