
#1
Feb1713, 10:35 AM

P: 103

I'm starting my study in eletromagnetism and I would like to know how do you deduce the eletric field produced by a single particle of charge q placed in the origin.
The magnetic field is constant so by Maxwell equations, the rotacional is 0 and the divergence is constant. Is this enough to deduce the field? I think I could deduce it but I would need to do it in polar coordinates, however, I don't know how to use rotacional and divergence in polar coordinates.. 



#2
Feb1713, 10:46 AM

Mentor
P: 10,767

To avoid singularities, you could distribute the charge in a sphere of radius r. div(E)=ρ (with some prefactor depending on the unit system) and rot(E)=0 will give the correct result. It is not sufficient to fix the field everywhere (you can always add constant fields and electromagnetic waves, for example), but you can require that the field is timeindependent and vanishes for large distances, for example. 



#3
Feb1713, 11:44 AM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 2,131

Your idea is correct. In electrostatic cases, i.e., all charges at rest forever, there are only electric field components and everything is time independent. Then you have [itex]\vec{B}=0[/itex] and the electric Maxwell equations simplify to (using HeavisideLorentz units):
[tex]\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{E}=\rho, \quad \vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}=0.[/tex] Here, the charge density is given by a [itex]\delta[/itex] distribution: [tex]\rho(\vec{x})=q \delta(\vec{x}).[/tex] We can expect that the solution is smooth everywhere except at the origin, where the singularity caused by the point charge sits. This is a simply connected region of space, and thus the vanishing curl of the electric field tells you that it has a scalar potential: [tex]\vec{E}=\vec{\nabla} \Phi.[/tex] Plugging this into the first equation leads to [tex]\Delta \Phi(\vec{x})=q \delta(\vec{x}).[/tex] Due to rotational symmetry around the origin, the potential is a function of the distance from the origin only, i.e., [tex]\Phi(\vec{x})=\Phi(r).[/tex] Now you don't need to know the formulae for the differential operators in shperical coordinates (although it's good to look them up in some textbook), but you can derive, what you need easily in this case. From the chain rule, you first find, using Cartesian coordinates [tex]\vec{\nabla} \Phi(r)=\Phi'(r) \vec{\nabla} r=\Phi'(r) \frac{\vec{x}}{r}[/tex] and then [tex]\Delta \Phi(r)=\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} r} \left (\frac{\Phi'(r)}{r} \right ) \vec{\nabla} r \cdot \vec{x}+ \frac{\Phi'(r)}{r} \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{x}=r \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} r} \left (\frac{\Phi'(r)}{r} \right ) +3 \frac{\Phi'(r)}{r}= \frac{1}{r^2} \left (r^2 \Phi'(r) \right)'.[/tex] For [itex]r>0[/itex] you have [tex]\frac{1}{r^2} \left (r^2 \Phi' \right)'=0.[/tex] This you can integrate successively: [tex]r^2 \Phi'(r)=C_1 \; \Rightarrow \; \Phi(r)=\frac{C_1}{r}+C_2.[/tex] The integration constant [itex]C_2[/itex] is physically irrelevant and is usually chosen to be [itex]C_2=0[/itex], so that the potential vanishes at infinity. The constant [itex]C_1[/itex] must be chosen such that you get the right charge from Gauß's Law. To that end we take [tex]\vec{E}=\vec{\nabla} \Phi=\frac{C_1}{r^2} \frac{\vec{x}}{r}.[/tex] Now integrating Gauß's Law over a sphere of radius [itex]R[/itex] gives, due to Gauß's integral theorem [tex]\int_{K_R} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \rho(\vec{x})=q=\int_{\partial K_R} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{A} \cdot \vec{E}=4 \pi C_1 \; \Rightarrow \; C_1=\frac{q}{4 \pi}.[/tex] This gives finally Coulomb's Law: [tex]\Phi(r)=\frac{q}{4 \pi r}, \quad \vec{E}=\vec{\nabla} \Phi=\frac{q}{4 \pi r^2} \frac{\vec{x}}{r}.[/tex] 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
independent equations of maxwell equations  Classical Physics  23  
Einstein holding Maxwell's equations above Newton's equations  Special & General Relativity  26  
Maxwell's equations VS. Lorentz & Coulomb force equations  Classical Physics  65  
Maxwell's equations and Coulomb's law  Classical Physics  22  
BiotSavart + Coulomb + Charge Conservation = Maxwell??  Classical Physics  8 