What is the common way to round up this number?


by cdux
Tags: common, number
cdux
cdux is offline
#1
Feb22-13, 11:17 PM
P: 190
0.444448

I want 4 digits.

Is it 0.4444

or is it

0.4445 because I say "since the next one becomes 5 because of the 8 then I consider the previous one a 5 as well"?
Phys.Org News Partner Mathematics news on Phys.org
Researchers help Boston Marathon organizers plan for 2014 race
'Math detective' analyzes odds for suspicious lottery wins
Pseudo-mathematics and financial charlatanism
DrewD
DrewD is offline
#2
Feb22-13, 11:23 PM
P: 427
It is less than halfway between 0.4444 and 0.4445 so you should not round up.
cdux
cdux is offline
#3
Feb22-13, 11:26 PM
P: 190
Quote Quote by DrewD View Post
It is less than halfway between 0.4444 and 0.4445 so you should not round up.
So, should it be limited to 0.44445 (from 0.444448) even if one aims for 4 digits?

edit: Also I'm not sure what 'less that halfway' means (in this context).

Simon Bridge
Simon Bridge is offline
#4
Feb22-13, 11:28 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
PF Gold
Simon Bridge's Avatar
P: 11,009

What is the common way to round up this number?


The rule is to round to the value that the number is closest to.
0.4444 <---<<< round down value
0.444448 <---<<< the number being considered
0.44445 <---<<< half-way mark (thanks DrewD)
0.4445 <---<<< round up value

0.444448 is closer to 0.4444 than it is to 0.4445 so you round down.
This is why the rule-of-thumb is that you only need to consider the next digit along when rounding.
ModusPwnd
ModusPwnd is offline
#5
Feb22-13, 11:56 PM
P: 850
This is also the reason you don't want to round "along the way" in your calculations. You try to do all of your rounding at the end, otherwise multiple roundings can compound and give you the wrong answer like they did here.
jtbell
jtbell is offline
#6
Feb23-13, 12:59 AM
Mentor
jtbell's Avatar
P: 11,239
Quote Quote by ModusPwnd View Post
You try to do all of your rounding at the end
Which means either (a) you keep your numbers in your calculator (using memory registers if necessary) throughout the calculation until the end, or (b) you do all the algebra first, symbolically, to get a single formula for your final result, then plug your numbers in and calculate the result all at one go in your calculator.
cdux
cdux is offline
#7
Feb23-13, 01:49 AM
P: 190
Ah thanks, I get it now. I should be thinking "it's 0.4444 because the 48 that follows is still lower than 50".


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Highest Common Factor and Lowest Common Multiple Precalculus Mathematics Homework 2
Cyclical Integration by Parts, going round and round Calculus & Beyond Homework 7
Minimum number of common elements in sets Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 2
VOTE PF Photo Contest - Going 'Round And 'Round General Discussion 14
Spaceships a'turnin round and round -- in space Astrophysics 5