
#1
Feb506, 07:34 PM

P: 139

Hi everybody,
I would like to know your opinion about this: The () minus sign is used to represent both negative numbers and subtraction. Of course, subtraction is a special case of addition, but we definitely use this operation instead of always writing a+(b) for example. So my question is, when we write ab we mean this: (a)b? I mean, the first minus is to indicate a negative number while the second subtraction? Also, have we set any precedence between these 2 different uses of the minus sign? I know that we say that we do subtractions from left to right but a small "problem" arises when the first term of an expression is negative. When we have for example 1+2a+34(z^2) ... all minus signs can be thought of as subtraction except from the first one. Is it clear that it is "part" of the first number,in other words a unary operator, and not a binary operator? I guess we could solve that "problem" by saying that we mean this: 01+.... But I am not sure which is the most sensible explanation. And one more thing: is it because of the definition of subtraction that we say it has the same precedence as addition? And when we write ab+2c+5 for example, is it because of this same precedence that this expression is equal to a+(b)+2c+5 and not to a+[(b+2c+5)]? That's all. Sorry if all these sound stupid to u. Thanks 



#2
Feb506, 09:13 PM

P: 367

I was taught that there were actually 3 meanings of the symbol "". The symbol can be part of a number like 5, it can mean subtraction like 42, or it can be negation as in (x+2). These three cases, however are sufficiently related, that often the line blurs between them (like does  in [itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex] express the negation of the result of the root, or is it simply part of the number "negative root 2"?). The ambiguity is irrelevant to the result, though, which is why we use the same symbol for all of these things.




#3
Feb506, 10:09 PM

HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 2,328

I just look at the negative sign as the additive inverse of the value it is in "front" of.
a  b = a + (b) ... the additive inverse of b.  a  b = (a) + (b) ... the additive inverse of a and b. When you having something like... (a + b), we say it's equal to ... (a + b) =  a  b = (a) + (b) ... which is the additive inverse of (a + b). It doesn't mean two different things in my books. 



#4
Feb606, 01:51 AM

P: 139

Negative numbersSubtraction
Thanks for your answers.
I agree (of course!) with everything you mention but I insist on my question: () minus sign is defined both as a unary operator and a binary one. So have we defined that these 2 uses of it have the same precedence or does this result from the definition of subtraction and of the number "a"? Thanks again 



#5
Feb606, 03:07 AM

P: 367

Yes and no. The definition of a  b is a + (b). But the "precedence" (or lack thereof, I guess) is purely convention. Whether we write a  b + c to mean (a  b) + c or a  (b+c) cannot be derived from any axioms, same as how a  b might as well mean a + b (but it doesn't). The fact that multiplication precedes addition is also convention. a*b+c*d does not mean (a*b)+(c*d) because that can be deduced from the axioms, but simply because of the way we write math. The convention could well have been +(*(a,b),*(c,d)) to mean ab + cd, which is alot clearer from the perspective of order of operations as it forces parentheses on you.
So, in short, the answer is that we defined that these 2 uses have the same precedence. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
How can you multiply two negative numbers?  General Math  69  
logs of negative numbers (any base)  Calculus & Beyond Homework  4  
PositiveNegative numbers  General Math  2  
natural logarithm of negative numbers  Introductory Physics Homework  8  
NeutronStar vs negative numbers  General Discussion  11 