Thread Closed

Integral and cylindrical shell

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
May17-06, 10:51 PM   #1
 

Integral and cylindrical shell


Use the method of cylindrical shells to find the volume generated by rotating the region bounded by the given curves about the y-axis.

y = [tex]x^2[/tex]
y = 4
x = 0

0 <= x <= 2

So I drew these:



I don't know how to determine which region to use (above or below
y = x^2 ). Either seems like it will work.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Intel's Haswell to extend battery life, set for Taipei launch
>> Galaxies fed by funnels of fuel
>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens
May17-06, 10:57 PM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Quote by merced
Use the method of cylindrical shells to find the volume generated by rotating the region bounded by the given curves about the y-axis.

y = [tex]x^2[/tex]
y = 4
x = 0

[tex] 0\leq x\leq 2 [/tex]

So I drew these:



I don't know how to determine which region to use (above or below
y =[tex]x^2[/tex]). Either seems like it will work.
Think (as the question advised) in terms of cylindrical shells (elements). You are rotating about the y-axis. What is the radius of the cylinder? What is the height? Hence determine the volume of that element, and set up the integral.
May17-06, 11:00 PM   #3
 
Quote by merced
I don't know how to determine which region to use (above or below
y =[tex]x^2[/tex]). Either seems like it will work.
The region above y=x^2 is sort of in the shape of a bullet pointed straight down the y-axis, and the region below y=x^2 forms a sort of dog dish shaped object. Notice that x=2 is not a bound for the curve. Look at what does bound the curve and that is what you need to find the volume of.
May17-06, 11:33 PM   #4
 

Integral and cylindrical shell


Actually, x = 2 is a bound because 0 <= x <= 2. Yeah, the book gives the area for the top part...but I don't see why it can't be the lower part.

If it was the lower part, you still could use cylindrical shells, right?
May17-06, 11:41 PM   #5
 
Quote by merced
Actually, x = 2 is a bound because 0 <= x <= 2. Yeah, the book gives the area for the top part...but I don't see why it can't be the lower part.
I think I see where you are getting confused...there is a difference between what x varies over, and what the bounds are.

In this case x varies from 0 to 2. That is different from a bound. Suppose the curve y=x^2 was bounded by y=0, and x=1, but x varied from 0 to a billion? It doesn't much matter how x varies so long as the problem makes sense. In this case, x=2 is not a bound, in which case you have the curve y=x^2, y=4 and x=0 (y-axis is x=0) as bounds. Draw that region, then rotate it about the y-axis and you have your volume. Set up the integral and evaluate.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Integral and cylindrical shell
Thread Forum Replies
Insulating Cylindrical Shell Introductory Physics Homework 20
cylindrical shell Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Cylindrical Shell Method Calculus 2
Cylindrical shell Calculus & Beyond Homework 9
Gauss' Law - Cylindrical Shell Introductory Physics Homework 9