Is the person on Xelia the same as the one who stepped into the transporter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phoenixy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the philosophical question of personal identity in the context of a hypothetical scenario involving a transporter, similar to those in Star Trek. Participants explore whether the person who emerges on Planet Xelia after being transported is the same individual as the one who entered the transporter, referencing John Locke's views on identity and consciousness.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that according to Locke, the person on Xelia would be considered the same individual because their memories and consciousness remain intact during the teleportation process.
  • Others argue that the process of teleportation resembles cloning, positing that the original self ceases to exist when the new self is created, leading to a form of death and rebirth.
  • A participant raises the need for clarification on how the transporter functions, particularly regarding any episodes that depict mental alterations resulting from transporter malfunctions.
  • Another participant mentions an episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation that addresses transporter psychosis, although details are not recalled.
  • Further research indicates that while there are instances of physical issues caused by the transporter, there are fewer examples of mental alterations, suggesting that the clone theory may be more applicable in a scientific context.
  • It is noted that Locke's definition of a person relies on their personalities, implying that if these are transferred without alteration, the individual remains the same.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the transported individual is the same as the original, with some supporting Locke's perspective while others propose alternative interpretations involving concepts of cloning and identity. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of Locke's philosophy, the ambiguity surrounding the mechanics of the transporter, and the lack of specific examples from Star Trek that address mental alterations due to transporter use.

phoenixy
Image you are a character on Star Trek. On the starship you step into the transporter. The machine breaks down your body, and then causes the matter on Planet Xelia to become organized into a body just like yours. That person then remembers what you did before getting in the transporter and sets about pursuing your mission of gathering samples and exploring the new planet. Would Locke say that person on Xelia is same person as you?

You can check out Locke's view regarding personal identity here
http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/Projects/digitexts/locke/understanding/chapter0227.html


What's your personal opinion(regardless of Locke)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is my own opinion to the question above

Personally, I believe Locke will believe that it's the same person. From what I understand, Locke believe a body can contain several different personalities, all independent from each other. However, only one can be "active" at a time, and the transition occurs only when the body lost the stream of conscious(ie. drunk, sleep, knock out)

From the question, we can conclude that the StarTrek member did not lose the stream of conscious, because as far as I know, the transporter teleports instantly. The person remembers his/her objective before and after the teleportation, so whatever personality governs him/her at the time is not interrupted. S/he is still ther same person before and after.


If we ignore Locke's point of view, then this becomes an open question. I can't think of any new ideas that support or disprove Locke's view(theoretically, since my understanding of Locke's idea might be insufficient/wrong). Any taker?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would liken transporting to cloning. If you create a clone of yourself, and you erased the part of the memory where the cloning occurred, the clone would never know he was a clone. Furthermore, if you didn't erase the memory, and the clone knew what happened he wouldn't know if he was the clone, or the other you was. So at the moment of transport, all your memories, feelings, thoughts, and personality are transferred to your "new self" At that moment your "old self" at the starting point dies, and a "new self" is created. It all appears seamless to the observer, but the original self ceases to exist. It doesn't appear to be so, because you've in essence, been cloned. However in a sense, you die and are reborn when you go through the transporter. So if you're the original person who has never gone through the teleporter, you actually die the first time you use one. To the original person, that is the end of their existence. From then on, all the other "you's" are just copies.

At least that's how it would seem to me.
 
We need to consult a StarTrek fan on this question: how exactly does the transporter work? Were there any cases/episode where transporter malfunctioning causes mental alteration?

I'm aware that in one episode a crew member wasn't reconstruct fully and she ended up dead. But I'm only interesting in mental(mind), not physical state(body).
 
actually, there was a whole episode in TNG on transporter psychosis but i forget the details.
 
I did a little research. It seems like beside one episode in which Cap Kirk is splitted(Evil/good twin), there are't any other episode where usage of transporter causes alteration of mind

transporter teleports material(life/inanimate) by converting the object into energy, then beam the energy to the destinated location. So I guess the clone theory is more portable in the scientific world.


But according to Locke, a person is defined by his personalties. Thus if they are transferred to another body and aren't alter in anyway, it's still the same person.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
5K