| Thread Closed |
pot. energy |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Nov29-05, 12:16 PM | #1 |
|
|
pot. energy
If h, the height of a body from the ground, approaches infinity, then the body's potential energy approaches 0? I'm assuming a non-constant value for g.
E_p = mgh. In this equation I get 0 times infinity, which is mathematically indeterminate, but I'm guessing that the physical interpretation takes it to equal 0? - Kamataat |
| Nov29-05, 12:35 PM | #2 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
|
That equation--[itex]E_p = mgh[/itex]--is only good for measuring gravitational PE near the surface of the earth. (As you note, g is not constant as the height of a body increases, but that equation ignores that fact.) Also, the implied reference point in that equation takes the surface of the earth as the point where PE = 0.
If you want to go to infinity, you'll have to integrate the work done against gravity which varies with distance. Also, it's more convenient to take infinity as the PE = 0 point, which makes the potential energy negative for sub-infinite distances. Just for the record, the gravitational PE for an object of mass m at a distance of r from center of the earth (where r > radius of the earth) is given by: [tex]-\frac{G M_{(earth)} m}{r}[/tex] |
| Nov29-05, 12:40 PM | #3 |
|
Recognitions:
|
h<<R(earth). The formula for larger h is E_p=(mgR^2)/(R+h), which-->0 as h-->infty. |
| Nov29-05, 01:00 PM | #4 |
|
|
pot. energy
So if a question asks to find the speed which a body must achieve at ground level to escape the Earth's grav. field, then I can take E_p@infinty = 0? From that |E_k|=|E_p| to find the speed?
- Kamataat |
| Nov29-05, 01:04 PM | #5 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
|
Sounds good. (Mechanical energy is conserved. The total energy at r = infinity that an object must have to just barely escape is zero.)
|
| Nov29-05, 01:14 PM | #6 |
|
|
Thank you!
- Kamataat |
| Dec1-05, 07:58 PM | #7 |
|
|
I don't think what you told is correct. This only means that the Kinetic energy of a body that jumps out of earth's gravitational field increases suddenly. This doesn't mean that 0 kinetic energy is enough for a body to be propelled outside the earth's gravitational field.
|
| Dec1-05, 08:30 PM | #8 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
|
|
| Dec2-05, 01:09 PM | #9 |
|
|
sorry-Doc Al
yes, much better interpretation is that escape velocity depends on gravitational force. as r tends to infinity gravitational force tends to zero. thus that's true. we were confused since we were comparing it with the potential energy. |
| Dec2-05, 09:38 PM | #10 |
|
|
ya i must ask what r going to infinity has to do with escape velocity, when one can simply assume its when KE=PE
|
| Dec3-05, 07:42 PM | #11 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
|
"Going to infinity" is what escaping the earth means. To just barely make it, you'd need zero speed at r = infinity. Since PE = 0 (by definition) at r = infinity, the total energy needed is zero. At the earth's surface, that translates into: KE + PE = 0. Thus KE = - PE. (PE is negative at the earth's surface.)
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: pot. energy
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| solar energy heat energy light energy...... | Engineering Systems & Design | 2 | ||
| HELP! ~ Mechanical Energy vs Potential Energy & Kinetic Energy | Introductory Physics Homework | 4 | ||
| [SOLVED] Mechanical Energy vs Potential Energy & Kinetic Energy | Introductory Physics Homework | 3 | ||
| Transformation of Kinetic and Gravitational Potential Energy:Conservation of Energy. | Introductory Physics Homework | 9 | ||
| Potential energy difference as a gate to perpetual energy transfers | General Physics | 21 | ||