Calculating Resultants of Parallel/Anti-Parallel Vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter EK03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the resultants of parallel and anti-parallel vectors, specifically focusing on two vectors of 12N and 5N. Participants explore the implications of vector orientation on resultant values and seek clarification on concepts related to maximum and minimum resultant forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the resultant of two parallel vectors and questions the meaning of maximum and minimum resultants. Some participants discuss stacking vectors head to tail and the implications of vector orientation on resultant values.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, validating each other's reasoning, and exploring different scenarios, such as perpendicular vectors. Guidance has been offered regarding the use of the Pythagorean theorem and vector components, although no consensus has been reached on specific methods.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a lack of diagrams in the original assignment, which may affect understanding. Additionally, the original poster is working with a unique textbook that does not align with standard resources, prompting questions about definitions and terminology.

EK03
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey I am in 11th grade 1st year of Physics. I am doing this lab and my head is blanking out. Problem is how to calculate the resultants of 2 parallel vectos of 12N and 5N and the next is what would it be if its anti parallel. I think it might be 17N for the 1st 1 and 7 for the antiparallel vector question but I am not positivve. also i don't understnad what it means by asking what the maximum resultant of the 2 vectors would be and also the minimum. Thank you, and equations to help me out would be greatly appriciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There aren't any equations really. To find the "resultant" or sum of vectors, stack them head to tail. In the first example, you have two vectors:

-----> 5 N
------------> 12 N

I made the 5 N vector boldface just to distinguish it. Stack them head to tail:

----->------------>

This is equivalent to one single vector:

-------------------> 17 N

In the second example, you have two vectors:

<----- 5 N
------------> 12 N

Stack them head to tail:

------<----->

You can see that the 5 N vector is basically "backtracking," going the opposite direction of the 12 N vector. The sum of these two vectors is

-------> 7 N

The last part of the question is asking "how should two vectors be oriented with respect to each other for the length of their sum to be the largest? or smallest?" You should be able to look at these pictures and explain this.

- Warren
 
thank you for validating my work. There are no pictures or diagrams on my assignment unfortunatley. Also I am not sure how to do the resultnat if they were mutually perpendicular, any suggestions?
 
Use the pythagorean theorem.
 
thanks nate, for the lab we recorded 4 trials of aligning the 3 forces on a piece of paper. Do i choose the lowest vector resultant as the minimum and biggest as the max like in Algebra?
 
Originally posted by EK03
thank you for validating my work. There are no pictures or diagrams on my assignment unfortunatley. Also I am not sure how to do the resultnat if they were mutually perpendicular, any suggestions?
Of course you know how -- they're just triangles! Trig to the rescue. For example, you could solve for the length L and angle a of this triangle:
Code:
       5
---------------->
   . a       100 \
         .        \  4
      L        .   \
                    v

where the resultant vector is represented by the dotted line.

In components, vectors on a plane can be represented by ordered pairs, like [itex](a,b)[/itex], where a is the horizontal component and b is the vertical component. To find the sum of two vectors [itex](a,b)[/itex] and [itex](c,d)[/itex], consider that the total horizontal distance must be [itex]a+c[/itex], and the total vertical distance must be [itex]b+d[/itex].

In other words, the sum is

[tex](a,b) + (c,d) = (a + c, b + d)[/tex]

To find the length and direction of this resultant vector, just imagine the right triangle it makes with the positive x-axis, and solve using the normal rules you'd use to solve any right triangle.

Does this make sense?

- Warren
 
yeah it did thanks a lot guys
 
is there some kind of physics dictionary? For instance i have to find the definition of the resultant (my teacher has his own book published we don't use normal school textbooks)
 
Originally posted by EK03
is there some kind of physics dictionary? For instance i have to find the definition of the resultant (my teacher has his own book published we don't use normal school textbooks)
Resultant = vector sum.

- Warren
 
  • #10
Originally posted by EK03
is there some kind of physics dictionary? For instance i have to find the definition of the resultant (my teacher has his own book published we don't use normal school textbooks)
Try google or Eric Weisstein's world of mathematics/physics for a start.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K