Electric field inside a sphere of charge density A/r

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the electric field inside a sphere with a charge density that varies inversely with the radius, specifically described by the equation ρ = A/r. Participants are exploring the implications of this charge distribution on the electric field within the sphere.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Gauss' law to find the electric field and questions the independence of the field from the radius. Others discuss integrating the charge density to understand the relationship between charge and electric field, while some participants raise concerns about the accuracy of the volume element used in the integration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the integration process and the effects of charge distribution on the electric field. There is a mix of agreement and questioning regarding the mathematical details and assumptions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of spherical coordinates and charge density integration, with some expressing their current level of understanding in calculus and the challenges posed by nested integrals.

Repetit
Messages
128
Reaction score
2
What is the electric field inside a sphere of radius R when the charge density is given by:
\rho=\frac{A}{r}
Where A is a constant, and r is the radius at where the charge density is to be evaluated. By Gauss' law I have calculated the field to be equal to:
E=\frac{A}{2\epsilon_0}
But that seems quite odd as the field is then independent of the radius. But could this be explained by the fact that the charge density is inversely proportional to the radius?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's correct. If you integrate the charge density over a sphere of radius R it's a little easier to see why this is so:

\int_0^R \int_0^{2 \pi} \int_0^{\pi} \rho r^2 \sin^2\theta d\theta d\phi dr
\int_0^R \int_0^{2 \pi} \int_0^{\pi} A r \sin^2\theta d\theta d\phi dr
A 4 \pi \int_0^R r dr
A 2 \pi R^2

So, the amount of charge which is inside a sphere of radius R increases with the square of the radius. The surface area of that sphere which the electric field lines are spread out over also increases with R^2, although it's larger by a factor of two. This is why there is no R dependence on the electric field, the two competing effects of total charge and surface area over which the electric field is spread cancel out.
 
I'm just starting my second Calculus course, those nested integrals look fun :eek:
 
Ubern0va said:
I'm just starting my second Calculus course, those nested integrals look fun :eek:

It's really not bad, you just start on the inside and work your way out. With a lot of problems you run into the same integrals over and over again and you just end up memorizing the answer, for instance:

\int_0^{2 \pi} \int_0^{\pi} \sin^2\theta d\theta d\phi = 4 \pi

comes up all the time (such as in this problem).
 
This is good, except I'm pretty sure the volume element on that integral is r2 sin[theta] dr d[theta] d[phi] for spherical coordinates instead of having a sin2 [theta] component. This is from Griffith's Intro to E&M
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
974
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K