Can internal manipulation affect the kinetic energy of a moving object?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores whether the kinetic energy of a moving object can be altered through internal manipulation without external influence. Participants consider scenarios involving a container fired from a cannon and the effects of internal mass manipulation on kinetic energy and momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if kinetic energy can be locally absorbed or altered in a closed system, using a container with an internal energy source as an example.
  • Another participant asserts that while linear momentum cannot change without external interaction, kinetic energy can be increased by internal relative motion, specifically affecting rotational kinetic energy.
  • A participant seeks clarification on whether it is possible to decay single vector kinetic energy in a closed system.
  • There is a discussion about the distinction between kinetic energy and momentum, with one participant stating that kinetic energy has no direction and suggesting that momentum is the relevant quantity.
  • Another participant challenges the idea that a closed system cannot change its momentum, citing electromagnetism as a potential exception to Newton's laws.
  • Further elaboration is requested on the relationship between electromagnetic interactions and Newton's third law, with one participant expressing skepticism about the implications for momentum conservation.
  • Another participant references the Biot-Savart law and discusses how certain electromagnetic situations can violate Newton's third law while still conserving momentum when considering field momentum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between kinetic energy, momentum, and the implications of Newton's laws, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the limitations of their scenarios, including the definitions of closed systems and the assumptions regarding external influences and forces.

pallidin
Messages
2,207
Reaction score
3
Is there a way that the kinetic energy of a moving object can be locally and internally absorbed or otherwise altered without outside influence?
For example, let's say that I have a container that has been fired out of a cannon at 100 mph. Now, this container has an abundant internal energy source available for anything expect outside thrust, as outside thrust is not permitted in any way(for this experiment)
Since the internal mass of the container is a direct function of the containers kinetic energy, can the internal mass be manipulated in-flight such to where the manipulation changes the strength or vectors of the containers kinetic energy?
Again, for example, if there were 2 lead balls of x-amount of weight affixed on the inside side walls of the container, and the internal energy source cause them to be violently pulled together towards the center of the container, does this action in any way affect the total kinetic energy of the containers motion?
Thank you greatly for your time and expertise.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The linear mometum cannot be changed without outside interaction, but you can increase the kinetic energy by having parts of the projectile move relative to each other. If you want the system to be closed, then this would only affect the projectile's rotational kinetic energy.
 
NateTG:

I understand what you have said, and I appreciate your comments. So is their no way at all to decay single vector kinetic energy in a closed system?
Thank you for your continued time.
 
"Closed" meaning free-flight with no additional external influence. Static systems(i.e. shock absorbers with earth-ground reactionary forces)are understood not to be applicable in this scenario.
 
Kinetic energy has no direction. I think you mean momentum.

Anyways, a closed system cannot change its own momentum if Newton's 3rd law is obeyed. Electromagnetism doesn't follow Newton's laws, so it is possible to alter your trajectory in flight.
 
Originally posted by Stingray
Kinetic energy has no direction. I think you mean momentum.

Anyways, a closed system cannot change its own momentum if Newton's 3rd law is obeyed. Electromagnetism doesn't follow Newton's laws, so it is possible to alter your trajectory in flight.

This is news to me, could you please elaborate.
 
Originally posted by Integral
This is news to me, could you please elaborate.
I believe some electromagnetic interactions do violate Newton's third law. (But in my coffee-deprived state I can't think of any specifics.) However, I don't agree that this implies a violation of momentum conservation. It would imply it, if Newton's third law were required for momentum conservation to hold, but I don't think that's true. Conservation of momentum is more fundamental than Newton's third law.

Hopefully there's an expert in the wings who can confirm this.
 
Look at the Biot-Savart law for example. Its very simple to set up situations which violate the strong form of the 3rd law (non-parallel wires).

In more dynamic situations, you can violate the weak form as well. This is mentioned in the Feynman lectures for example.

Momentum conservation still works as long as you take account of the momentum contained in the fields. If you only look at the material objects, momentum can be changed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K