Conservation of Momentum in a Billiard Ball Collision

  • Thread starter Thread starter bard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Momentum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a conservation of momentum problem involving a collision between two billiard balls. The first ball, with a known mass and initial velocity, strikes a second ball that is initially at rest. The problem requires the application of momentum conservation principles to determine the final speed and angle of the second ball after the collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equations for conservation of momentum in both x and y directions. There are attempts to solve for the final speed and angle of the second ball, with some participants expressing uncertainty about whether to provide numerical answers or to solve in terms of variables. Questions arise regarding the simplification of equations and the interpretation of angles.

Discussion Status

Several participants have shared their attempts at solving the equations, with some providing numerical values and others questioning the clarity of the problem's requirements. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of using different angles and the potential for errors in calculations. Guidance has been offered regarding the algebraic manipulation of the equations, but no consensus has been reached on the final answers.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of clarity regarding whether the problem expects numerical solutions or solutions in terms of variables. There is also mention of the coefficient of restitution in relation to elastic collisions, which may influence the interpretation of the problem.

bard
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
A billiard ball of mass [tex]m_{A}=0.400kg[/tex] moving with a speed [tex]v_{A} =1.8m/s[/tex] strikes a second ball, initially at rest, of mass [tex]M_{B}=0.500kg[/tex]. As a result of the collision, the first ball is deflected off at an angle of [tex]30\deg[/tex] with a speed of [tex]v'_{A}=1.1 m/s[/tex].

a) taking the x-axis as the positive direction of motion of ball A, write down the equations expressing the conservation of momentum for the components in the x and y directions seperatley.

B)Solve the equations for the speed, [tex]v'_{B}[/tex], and the angle, [tex]\theta'_{2}[/tex] of ball b. Do not assume the collision is elastic.

my work

[tex]equations[/tex]

[tex]m_{A}v_{A}=m_{A}v'_{A}\cos\theta'+ m_{B}v'_{b}\cos\theta'_{2}[/tex]

[tex]0=m_{A}v'_{A}\sin\theta'+m_{B}v'_{b}\sin\theta'_{2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I tried my hand at it, but bear with me, I didn't have my calc handy so I couldn't simplify anything, so I had to carry a bunch of phrases. As far as answers, I got [tex]\theta_{2} = \sin^{-1} \frac{.5(1.1)\sin (\frac{\pi}{6})}{-.4(1.8)}[/tex] For Vfinal for the initially moving ball, I got...
[tex]V_f=\frac{.4(1.8) - .5(1.1)\cos(\frac{\pi}{6})}{.4\cos(\theta_{2})}[/tex]
Like I said though, I didn't have a good way to test it out or anything, but that it was I gots, where [tex]\theta_{2}[/tex] is in radians, and in standard position. The whole [tex]2\pi-\theta_2[/tex] thing was unaccurate because it will output [tex]\theta_2[/tex] in standard position or as a negative, and doing subtracting it from [tex]2\pi[/tex] will merely warp the results. Try it out and tell me if I was close or not.
[/tex] because the signs are different between the ref angle, which is what [tex]\theta_2[/tex] is, and the actual angle, which is the aforementioned angle.
To get, I basically plugged into [tex]m_1v_o=m_1v_{1f}\cos(\theta_{2})+m_2v_{2f}\cos(\fract{\pi}{6})[/tex]
and
[tex]0=m_1v_{1f}\sin(\theta_2)+m_2v_{2f}\sin(\frac{\pi}{6})[/tex]
 
Last edited:
coefficient of restitution is 1 for elatic collisions which will also help u
 
Originally posted by bard
B)Solve the equations for the speed, [tex]v'_{B}[/tex], and the angle, [tex]\theta'_{2}[/tex] of ball b. Do not assume the collision is elastic.
Your equations look fine to me. What's the problem? If you plug in the numbers, you'll get two very simple equations. Did you try it?
 
well I am not sure whether this problem has a definite answer(as in 1.2 or 3.4 etc)or whther I am suposed to solve in terms of variables
 
Originally posted by bard
well I am not sure whether this problem has a definite answer(as in 1.2 or 3.4 etc)or whther I am suposed to solve in terms of variables
If they meant you to solve it in terms of variables, why did they bother giving you all those values? Just plug in the numbers, then rewrite the two equations. You'll have two (simple) equations with two unknowns.
 
can someone help me in simplifying these equations? thnx
 
Originally posted by bard
can someone help me in simplifying these equations? thnx
What are you looking for? An algebraic simplification without having to use the given information? Not going to happen. Did you try plugging in the numbers?
 
yes i plugged in numbers and i got

[tex].068=v'_{B}\cos\theta'_{2[/tex]

[tex]-.72=v'_{B}\sin\theta'_{2}[/tex]

thats all i can do to simplify
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Originally posted by bard
yes i plugged in numbers and i got

[tex].068=v'_{B}\cos\theta'_{2[/tex]

[tex]-.72=v_{B}\sin\theta'_{2}[/tex]

thats all i can do to simplify
Check your numbers. I got:
[tex].68=v'_{B}\cos\theta'_{2}[/tex]

[tex]-.44=v'_{B}\sin\theta'_{2}[/tex]

These equations are easy to solve! To get the angle, divide them to get [tex]tan\theta'_{2}[/tex]. Then plug back into get [tex]v'_{B}[/tex]. It won't get much easier than that.
 
  • #11
Hey Doc Al,

thnx for helping me through this process :).

I got [tex]\theta_{2}=-33[/tex]

[tex]v'_{B}=.81 m/s[/tex]
 
  • #12
I had made my classical error of using the reference angle for [tex]\theta[/tex] rather than the true angle, and I swapped a sign or two when I did it on paper. Sorry, at least when I reworked it my answers matched up :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K