Thread Closed

Uh oh... Proposed Constitutional Amendment

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Feb21-06, 10:37 PM   #1
 

Uh oh... Proposed Constitutional Amendment


http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...H.J.RES.24.IH:
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 17, 2005
Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SABO, and Mr. PALLONE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
__________________________________________________

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

`Article --

`The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed.'.
I seriously doubt it's going to get through though.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Bird's playlist could signal mental strengths and weaknesses
>> Minus environment, patterns still emerge: Computational study tracks E. coli cells' regulatory mechanisms
>> Bacterium uses natural 'thermometer' to trigger diarrheal disease, scientists find
Feb21-06, 10:59 PM   #2
 
Has this already been gone over or does no one remember what the 22nd amendment is?
Feb21-06, 11:01 PM   #3
 
Short-sighted political stunt.
Feb21-06, 11:05 PM   #4

Community 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member

Uh oh... Proposed Constitutional Amendment


The democrats are just doing their usual screwing around trying to grab attention to themselves instead of doing their jobs.
Feb21-06, 11:36 PM   #5
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Pengwuino
The democrats are just doing their usual screwing around trying to grab attention to themselves instead of doing their jobs.
What about Sensenbrenner? He's Republican. But, yeah, what the .... are they doing? The rest are all Democrats, so it appears to be a stunt of some sort (don't know any reason they'd seriously do this, but, they have, haven't they), and it's not even April 1.
Feb21-06, 11:40 PM   #6

Community 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Yah a single republican

I wonder if anyones going to freak out and think this is Bush taking over the US
Feb21-06, 11:44 PM   #7
 
Quote by Moonbear
What about Sensenbrenner? He's Republican. But, yeah, what the .... are they doing? The rest are all Democrats, so it appears to be a stunt of some sort (don't know any reason they'd seriously do this, but, they have, haven't they), and it's not even April 1.
Alot of people talking about this seem to be hoping for a rerun of Clinton. There was talk of such an amendment while he was in office too.
Feb21-06, 11:51 PM   #8
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by TheStatutoryApe
Alot of people talking about this seem to be hoping for a rerun of Clinton. There was talk of such an amendment while he was in office too.
That's not much more reassuring to me.
Feb21-06, 11:52 PM   #9
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Pengwuino
Yah a single republican
Yeah, but it means you can't entirely blame it in the Democrats.
Feb21-06, 11:53 PM   #10

Community 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Moonbear
Yeah, but it means you can't entirely blame it in the Democrats.
Well its normally a-ok to do the opposite around here
Feb21-06, 11:59 PM   #11
 
Quote by Pengwuino
Well its normally a-ok to do the opposite around here
That kind of junk is always being thrown about...Democrats catch crap for being against Bush (Because, as well all know, this is America...we don't have the right to hold our own opinions here. ) and Republicans catch crap for lieing...when both sides lie through their teeth.
Feb22-06, 12:06 AM   #12

Community 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by AngelShare
That kind of junk is always being thrown about...Democrats catch crap for being against Bush (Because, as well all know, this is America...we don't have the right to hold our own opinions here. ) and Republicans catch crap for lieing...when both sides lie through their teeth.
hehe you haven't been around here much have you
Feb22-06, 12:17 AM   #13
 
Quote by Pengwuino
hehe you haven't been around here much have you
No, I have not. However, I was not talking about this site when I made that post. I like this site but I would never even think of using it in a political discussion, that's a rather weak way to make your point. "There are these Republicans on a site I frequent that slam Democrats every time they post, I can't stand them and their damn party!!"

I've heard enough to know that Republicans like to slam Democrats, first and foremost, for disliking Bush. That's always been something that confuses me, really...because, like I tried to point out in my other post, this is America. To assume everyone will agree with you is asinine. However, instead of being amongst those who like to slam the opposing party simply because they're the opposing part, I'd much rather spend my time agreeing with whoever makes the most sense regardless of what they are. That allows me to see that both sides lie and that both sides are crooked.

Now, whether this site is populated with more Democrats than Republicans or vice versa, I don't base my posts off of this site's overall opinion on political matters.
Feb22-06, 12:18 AM   #14
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
You all did notice the date, right?
February 17, 2005
Feb22-06, 12:21 AM   #15
 
Ivan Seeking: Clearly not.
Feb22-06, 12:21 AM   #16
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Ivan Seeking
You all did notice the date, right?
February 17, 2005
You mean it's not still 2005? Nope, I missed that. It's twice in two days I've seen something and thought it was recent when it really was a year ago! It just isn't sticking with me that it's really 2006.
Feb22-06, 12:21 AM   #17
 
Quote by Ivan Seeking
You all did notice the date, right?
February 17, 2005
I know. I haven't found anything yet that would indicate what happened with it. I'm not familiar enough to know whether it could still be sitting around collecting dust or if it would have to already have been approved or struck down.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Uh oh... Proposed Constitutional Amendment
Thread Forum Replies
Is there a loophole in the 1st Amendment? Current Events 8
2nd Amendment Upheld Current Events 92
Iraq will be the only Constitutional Democracy in the middle east? Current Events 19
Proposed Schedule Academic Guidance 5
No first amendment, K-12, why? Social Sciences 3