Calculating Net Force on a Mass in an Equilateral Triangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Finns14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
Three uniform spheres are positioned at the corners of an equilateral triangle with a side length of 1.48 m, where two spheres each have a mass of 2.18 kg, and the third sphere's mass is unknown. To calculate the initial acceleration of the third sphere, the gravitational force between the spheres must be determined using the equation F = G(m1m2/d^2). The masses of the two known spheres can be combined to simplify calculations, treating them as a single mass of 4.36 kg. The center of mass between the two known spheres should be identified to accurately assess the distance to the unknown mass and calculate the net force vectorially. Understanding these concepts will help clarify the approach to finding the initial acceleration of the third sphere.
Finns14
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Three uniform spheres are located at the corners of an equilateral triangle. Each side of the triangle has a length of 1.48 m. Two of the spheres have a mass of 2.18 kg each. The third sphere (mass unknown) is released from rest. Considering only the gravitational forces that the spheres exert on each other, what is the magnitude of the initial acceleration of the third sphere?


Thats the question I know that some how I have to use the equations

F=G(m1m2/d^2) but besides for that I don't know. I know I probably the force towards one sphere planet and then separate that vector into x and y and then double that to include both sphere but I am still very confused. Thanks in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use your equation
F = \frac{GMm}{d^2}
and equate with Newtons law (F =ma)
ma = \frac{GMm}{d^2}
The masses of the unknown sphere (m) will cancel giving:
a = \frac{GM}{d^2}
Remeber this is the only the acceleration of one sphere. As you say you will then consider the vectors (draw a diagram). You can double the force, but you will first have to find the centre of mass of the two known balls, then assume the force acts from that point.

Hope this helps
 
Ok question in the second equations m cancels on both sides but what is M?
 
Also I am confused on the angle you would use if you need to consider a point between 2 spheres? Can anyone clarify that for me a little better?
 
If you find the centre of mass of the two spheres of know mass, it will be the mid point between the two masses. You can then consider the two masses as a single mass of 2 \times 2.18 = 4.36kg, this is the M, the combined mass of the two spheres. d is then the distance from this point to the unknown mass.
 
Hootenanny said:
If you find the centre of mass of the two spheres of know mass, it will be the mid point between the two masses. You can then consider the two masses as a single mass of 2 \times 2.18 = 4.36kg, this is the M, the combined mass of the two spheres. d is then the distance from this point to the unknown mass.

Ummmm...There's nothing wrong with Hootenanny's post, but I think it might be more instructive to do it this way:

Let's think of it this way. Force is a vector. So what you need to do is to consider the force from EACH mass separately and add them vectorally to get the net force on your moving mass. (Then of course, netF=ma will cancel out the unknown mass in the equations.)

-Dan
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
14K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K