Register to reply 
Magnetic flux question 
Share this thread: 
#1
Mar406, 01:53 AM

P: 777

This question might seem rather naive.
We define the magentic flux through a loop by [itex]\Phi = \int \vec B \cdot d\vec a[/itex]. But an infinite number of different surfaces can be fitted to a given boundary line....so how is the flux independent of the nature of the surface used? 


#2
Mar406, 03:42 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 2,002

In general, flux isn't defined through a loop (to my knowlegde), it is always defined through a surface. (It's a surface integral). Different surfaces bounding the same loop will in general give different answers.
Exception: If the divergence of the field F is zero everywhere:[itex]\vec \nabla \cdot \vec F =0[/itex], then we can write [itex]\vec F=\vec \nabla \times \vec A[/itex] for some field A. Now you can use Stokes' theorem to prove that for a given boundary line, the flux is independent of the surface bounded by that line. Since div B=0 always and everywhere, you can unambigously talk about the magnetic flux through a loop (although I would still never say 'flux through a loop') 


#3
Mar506, 01:12 AM

P: 777

Thanks for the reply.
So, that means [itex]\vec \nabla \cdot \vec B = 0[/itex] guarantees that [itex]\int \vec B \cdot d\vec a[/itex] is the same for all surfaces within a given boundary? 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Magnetic Flux type question.  Introductory Physics Homework  5  
Magnetic Force,EMF, Flux question  Introductory Physics Homework  6  
Magnetic Flux & Electric Flux  Classical Physics  2  
Totally lost on magnetic flux question  Introductory Physics Homework  1  
Magnetic Flux question  Introductory Physics Homework  2 