| Thread Closed |
Absorption vs. Transmission |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar11-06, 11:08 PM | #1 |
|
Absorption vs. Transmission
I'm a little confused, we have tested chemical concentrations based on how much light it can absorb. What i don't understand is why something can have a reading of 60% transmission yet also have an absorption of 22.2% via the equation A = LOG(1/T), T being tranmission, A being absorption. Seems like it should be a 40% absorption. Then i realized i might not quite understand what it means when a spectrometer is reading "Absorption and Transmission". Can someone explain?
|
| Mar12-06, 02:47 AM | #2 |
|
|
The rest goes to scattering processes I guess. One can split the mass-energy absorption factor to elastic and inelastic scattering and photoabsorption.
|
| Mar12-06, 01:52 PM | #3 |
|
Recognitions:
|
You may have got something wrong with your equation. Maybe you should consult the manual again.
|
| Mar12-06, 02:48 PM | #4 |
|
Absorption vs. Transmission |
| Mar12-06, 02:49 PM | #5 |
|
|
Reflection accounts for some of the difference....
[tex] R + T + A = 1 [/tex] for all processes. |
| Mar12-06, 03:14 PM | #6 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Hey, when T<0.1 -> A>1. That surely does NOT work. You must have forgot something crucial.
|
| Mar12-06, 03:26 PM | #7 |
|
|
Ich is right, not only does that allow for absorption to be more than 100%, but A+T > 100% whenever the transmission is less than 13.7%.
|
| Mar12-06, 04:51 PM | #8 |
|
|
|
| Mar12-06, 05:09 PM | #9 |
|
It was a lab for our chem course, we didn't have manuals to consult, we were just told "here, use this equation" and did as we were told haha.
|
| Mar12-06, 07:31 PM | #10 |
|
|
|
| Mar13-06, 03:18 AM | #11 |
|
It was probably the only time we used the spectrometer this semester haha. It was one of those "hey look, you can determine concentration via light absorption, how bout that" experiments.
|
| Mar13-06, 03:39 AM | #12 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Got it now - You´re measuring absorbance, not absorption.
|
| May12-08, 04:18 AM | #13 |
|
|
Your reading of 22.2 is about right. If transmission = T is 60%, or 0.60, then per your formula absorption = A is log(1/T). Well, 1/.60 is 1.66, and the log of that is .2218, or about 22.2%. So your work stands.
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Absorption vs. Transmission
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Excitation vs. Absorption | Quantum Physics | 4 | ||
| Photon Absorption | Introductory Physics Homework | 2 | ||
| Absorption of food | Biology | 2 | ||
| infared ray absorption | Chemistry | 9 | ||
| UVC Absorption Terminology | General Physics | 0 | ||