Register to reply 
Relation between diffraction and wavelength 
Share this thread: 
#1
Mar1406, 01:41 AM

P: 228

In order for diffraction to occur, the slit width must be on the order of the wavelength, correct? I'm puzzled because if the wave is measured along the xaxis while the slit is along the yaxis, I don't see the connection. Is this best described as a quantum mechanical effect? By passing through the slit the position of the wave is well known, resulting in a great uncertainty in the momentum which leads to the "spreading out" of the wave. What's the classical analong? Hyugens' principle?



#2
Mar1406, 05:51 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,474

Diffraction occurs regardless, there is no prior requirement that must be met. In the (theoretical) case of an infinite plane wave incident on a rectangular aperture, the extent of the diffraction (i.e. the farfield angle) depends on (wavelength)/(aperture width), that is, the size of the wavelength compared to the size of the aperture.
Diffraction is usually regarded as a classical effect since diffraction is 'builtin' to Maxwell's equations. Claude. 


#3
Mar1406, 09:16 PM

P: 228

So say I shine a laser pointer though a doorway, there's still going to be some (albeit slight) diffraction?



#4
Mar1506, 02:28 AM

Mentor
P: 11,626

Relation between diffraction and wavelength
If the beam is narrower than the doorway, you're not going to get any diffraction from the doorway.
If you shine the beam so it grazes one side of the doorway, then ideally you get "knifeedge diffraction" which is a wellstudied situation. The thickness of a real wall will mess things up in practice, though. 


#5
Mar1506, 03:00 AM

P: 228

So the beam has to be wider than the doorway for diffraction to occur. Does the wavelength play a role if it is not an infinite plane wave hitting the slit, but instead some other sort of wave (spherical, for example)?



#6
Mar1506, 05:31 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,474

A laser beam diffracts even in the absence of any apertures.
Why does an aperture cause an infinite plane wave to diffract? Because it TRUNCATES the wavefront. It is this truncation (or 'cuttingoff') that results in the diffraction predicted by Maxwell's equations. A laser pointer emits wavefronts that are ALREADY truncated, thus it will diffract. Shining a laser through a doorway will not have an effect because the doorway does not truncate the wavefront any further. Any aperture that DOES truncate the beam further, will cause the laser beam to diffract more than normal. Claude. 


#7
Mar1506, 10:13 PM

P: 228

So forget about laser beams or electromagnetic waves. What about water waves or sound waves? Obviously these will also diffract if the wavefront is truncated because they are described by similar (wave) equations. What about my quantummechanical viewpoint. Is that another way of viewing the same phenomena for, say, an electron through a slit?



#8
Mar1606, 02:31 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,893

Yes, you truncate the possible locations where the electron could be.



#9
Mar1606, 07:14 PM

P: 228

Which I say is equivalent to knowing the position of the electron better, therefore greater uncertainity in the momentum which "spreads out" the wavefunction.



#10
Mar1606, 07:25 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,474

I have seen such arguments made in elementary physics texts, though I find it a little too handwavey for my liking.
Claude. 


#11
Mar1606, 08:44 PM

P: 228

Really? What's handwavey about it? I guess one would have to do some calculations to make it more concrete. Do you know if this has been done?



#12
Mar1606, 09:05 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 29,239

http://www.physicsforums.com/journal...y&e=79&enum=24 Zz. 


#13
Mar1906, 06:15 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,474

These textbooks are written for an audience who are just being introduced to QM, and is more to illustrate the idea of the HUP. So I can see why they would skip that part or just gloss over it, a rigorous analysis would be far more intimidating for the reader. I'm sure such rigorous derivations exist, but they belong in advanced texts and journal papers. Claude. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
[Multiple Choice] ...wavelength of an object. de Broglie wavelength  Introductory Physics Homework  11  
Wavelength & Distance Relation in MICROWAVE  General Physics  7  
Diffraction through a subwavelength aperture  Classical Physics  0  
Measuring the wavelength of light using diffraction  General Physics  1  
Measuring the wavelength of light using diffraction  Introductory Physics Homework  1 