Finite Wings


by ChrisHarvey
Tags: finite, wings
ChrisHarvey
ChrisHarvey is offline
#1
Apr19-06, 03:20 AM
P: 55
If I take an infinitely long, thin wing and measure its lift curve slope I should get 2pi.

Now if I take a 1/2-wing and fit 1 end to a plate and test it in a wind tunnel, it should simulate the flow around a full span wing, am I wrong? Therefore measuring lift and working out the CL values using the area of the half wing, air density, and flow speed I should get approximately the same results for CL as for a full wing (same section) twice the area and twice the aspect ratio (with no plates fitted to the ends).

I've done that experiment for a NACA 0015 aerofoil section and my results are confusing me. I understand the theory and the limitations of Prandtl's lifting line theory but this doesn't seem to be helping me here.

I was expecting the theoretical and experimental results to match up fairly well (looking at Prandtl's graphs they are pretty much identical).

The 1/2-wing I used was AR 3. Therefore it simulated the full wing AR 6. If I use AR 3 for the theoretical calculations the graphs match perfectly, but I can't do this, because the 1/2-wing AR 3 was simulating a wing AR 6 with that attachment plate on 1 end. So... experimentally the lift curve slope is 3.5rad-1 and theoretically it's 4.5rad-1.

Can anyone just point me in the direction of the reason for this massive difference? I'm guessing it's something to do with the 1/2-wing with a centre-line plate mount not properly simulating the flow around a full span wing, but this to me would suggest a steeper lift curve slope than theoretically predicted because there's 1 less wing tip vortex to cause more downwash over the rest of the wing.

I hope someone can make sense of that - I'm sure the only reason I can understand what I've written is because I know what I'm trying to say!
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Better thermal-imaging lens from waste sulfur
Hackathon team's GoogolPlex gives Siri extra powers
Bright points in Sun's atmosphere mark patterns deep in its interior
ChrisHarvey
ChrisHarvey is offline
#2
Apr19-06, 08:46 AM
P: 55
As is usually the case I answer my own question: the main (obvious reason) is that the theory I was using (Prandtl's lifting line theory) assumes invsicid flow and of course there are viscous effects (even if small).


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Wings with holes Mechanical Engineering 17
Aircraft Wings Mechanical Engineering 2
Fluid Dynamics (finite difference or finite volume) Advanced Physics Homework 1
Design of car wings Mechanical Engineering 11
lift of wings Aerospace Engineering 8