Register to reply

Capacitance equation

by dan greig
Tags: capacitance, equation
Share this thread:
dan greig
#1
Apr26-06, 10:51 AM
P: 41
how would i rearrange this equation to find the capacitance, c?

V=Vo exp(-t/RC)
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
New type of solar concentrator desn't block the view
Researchers demonstrate ultra low-field nuclear magnetic resonance using Earth's magnetic field
Asian inventions dominate energy storage systems
daveb
#2
Apr26-06, 11:05 AM
P: 925
Do you know what the inverse of the exponential function is?
dan greig
#3
Apr26-06, 11:16 AM
P: 41
would it go to,

V = Vo ln + (-t/RC)

then to,

V = ln Vo - t x 1/RC

daveb
#4
Apr26-06, 11:22 AM
P: 925
Capacitance equation

You're right that you use the natural log function, but your form is incorrect. What would happen if you take the natural log of the exponential function, or ln(e^x) = ?
dan greig
#5
Apr26-06, 11:31 AM
P: 41
ln(e) + x ?????

not really sure you've lost me a bit sorry
berkeman
#6
Apr26-06, 11:44 AM
Mentor
berkeman's Avatar
P: 40,928
Quote Quote by dan greig
ln(e) + x ?????

not really sure you've lost me a bit sorry
Let's do it first with the more familiar base 10.

log( 10^2 ) = 2 (right?)

log( 10^x ) = ?

ln( e^x ) is analogous to log( 10^x )...
dan greig
#7
Apr26-06, 11:50 AM
P: 41
log(10^x) = x ?

analogous?? The same as??

but log e = 1

does that mean log e^x = 1^x ?

therefore log e^x = x ?
berkeman
#8
Apr26-06, 12:12 PM
Mentor
berkeman's Avatar
P: 40,928
Quote Quote by dan greig
log(10^x) = x ?

analogous?? The same as??

but log e = 1

does that mean log e^x = 1^x ?

therefore log e^x = x ?
No, you need to keep your log() and ln() straight. log() is used with base 10 math, and ln() is used with base e math.

log( 10^x ) = x

ln( e^x ) = ?

Try a few numbers on your calculator to help you keep it straight. There's a reason that most calculators overload the log() key with 10^x and overload the ln() key with e^x.....
Reshma
#9
Apr27-06, 09:59 AM
P: 777
Quote Quote by dan greig
would it go to,

V = Vo ln + (-t/RC)

then to,

V = ln Vo - t x 1/RC
How come you did not take the natural log on the left hand side?
If this is your original equation, then:
V=Vo exp(-t/RC)
[tex]\ln V = \ln V_0 - {t\over RC}[/tex]

Furthur evaluation is simple.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Self Capacitance Electrical Engineering 1
Capacitance in circuit Introductory Physics Homework 15
Capacitance problem help Introductory Physics Homework 3
General definition of capacitance Classical Physics 5
Circuits and low pass filters Introductory Physics Homework 0