How can the parallelogram law be proven?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter franz32
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Parallelogram
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the parallelogram law in the context of vector mathematics, specifically focusing on the relationships between vector norms and dot products. It includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of related properties.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a challenge to prove the parallelogram law and provides a series of related mathematical statements involving matrices and vectors.
  • Another participant derives expressions for the squares of the sums and differences of vectors, leading to a relationship involving the dot product.
  • A subsequent reply confirms the earlier derivations and emphasizes the equivalence of the expressions for the sums and differences of vectors.
  • Another participant reiterates that knowing the properties of the vector norms allows for straightforward proof of the parallelogram law by combining the derived expressions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical steps involved in proving the parallelogram law, but there is no explicit consensus on the overall approach or completeness of the proof.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the properties of vector norms and dot products are implicit in the discussion. The completeness of the proof steps is not fully resolved, and the discussion includes multiple mathematical expressions that may require further clarification.

franz32
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone! =)

This might be a good challenge to everyone here... =)

1.) Let A be an n X n matrix and let x and y be vectors in R^n.
Show that Ax .y = x.(A^T)(y), where "." means dot product and T is 'transpose'.

2. show that u.v = (1/4)// u + v //^2 - (1/4)//u - v//^2
where u and v are vectors; "." means dot product and
//...// denote the length of a vector.

3. Prove the parallelogram law: // u + v //^2 + // u - v //^2 =
2 //u//^2 + 2 //v//^2.

4. Prove the Vandermonde determinant.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex](\vec{u}+\vec{v})^2=\vec{u}^2+\vec{v}^2+2\vec{u}.\vec{v}[/tex]

[tex](\vec{u}-\vec{v})^2=\vec{u}^2+\vec{v}^2-2\vec{u}.\vec{v}[/tex]

[tex](\vec{u}+\vec{v})^2 - (\vec{u}-\vec{v})^2 = 4\vec{u}.\vec{v}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(\vec{u}+\vec{v})^2 - (\vec{u}-\vec{v})^2}{4} = \vec{u}.\vec{v}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Hello there!

Hi.

You're right. Well, if you pretty know the property involved on the right side, you could expand the following...

//u + v//^2 = //u//^2 + //v//^2 + 2 (u.v) and
//u - v//^2 = //u//^2 + //v//^2 - 2 (u.v) Thus

u.v = (1/4)//u//^2 + (1/4)//v//^2 + 1/2(u.v) - (1/4)//u//^2 - (1/4)//v//^2 + 1/2(u.v)

u.v = 1/2(u.v) + 1/2(u.v)
= u.v
 
Parallelogram Law

In #3, it is very easy, as long as you know the equivalent of
//u + v//^2 and //u - v//^2 (look on the previous replies.)

the sum of the two yields:

//u//^2 + //v//^2 + 2(u.v) + //u//^2 + //v//^2 - 2(u.v)

and thus = 2//u//^2 + 2//v//^2

In Vandermonde determinant, use the cofactor for easier proving.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K