
#1
Jun1606, 11:26 AM

P: 5

Shollenbarger's Clock:
Excluding 12:00, Is there ever a time on a clock where the second, minute and hour hands are equidistant from each other? (In other words, the three hands are all 120° apart? If yes, give the EXACT time(s) that this occurs. If no, prove that no such time exists. Good Luck! 



#2
Jun1706, 01:30 PM

P: 352


If you include 12:00  The second hand could be on 12:00, the minute hand on 4:00 and the hour hand on 8:00 Time would be 8:20  If you exclude 12:00  I personally don't think it's possible. If any four hour marks distance stand for 120° (each hour mark is 30°), then 12:00 must be included. Thus no such time exists! 



#3
Jun1706, 03:22 PM

P: 546





#4
Jun1706, 05:15 PM

P: 5

Shollenbarger's Clock
Parlyne is correct. I wanted to exclude 12:00:00 from consideration as an answer, because all three hands are on top of each other. But one hand can be pointing at 12.
8:20:00 is not a valid solution: From second to minute: 120° From minute to hour: 130° From hour to second: 110° 



#5
Jun1706, 05:29 PM

P: 352

What about:
hour hand on 4:00, minute hand on 12:00 and second hand on 8:00 Time = 4:00 



#6
Jun1706, 05:41 PM

P: 5

From minute to hour: 119 2/3° From hour to second: 119 2/3° From second to minute: 120 2/3° The hour hand cannot be at 4:00 or the minute hand at 12:00 when the second hand is at 8:00, because it would now be 40 seconds after 4:00, thus the hour hand and the second would have moved slightly. Keep trying. (Fractions of a second are allowed as valid answers, if needed.) 



#7
Jun1706, 05:58 PM

P: 352

My last attempt of the day is:
Hour hand on 3:00 Minute hand on 0:59 Second hand on 0:00:39 Time = 3:59:39 



#8
Jun1706, 06:22 PM

P: 5

From minute to hour: 121.925° From hour to second: 114.175° From second to minute: 123.9° 



#9
Jun1806, 03:15 AM

P: 29

its not possible.......one way of proving it is assume the time as xhrs, yhrs, and z secs........and put appropriate conditions on them... then find angles and solve..........




#10
Jun1806, 04:04 AM

P: 352

What conditions? 



#11
Jun1806, 01:38 PM

P: 38

I too believe it's impossible. I haven't finished the proof, but the idea is that I make the hour, minutes and seconds hands of the clock into unit vectors which are a function of time, then take dot products and set them equal (because the dot product of any two of the aforementioned vectors must be 1*1*cos[120 deg], i.e. 4 hourmarks apart) and finally show that there's no way that that's possible. There might be an easier way, but I like vectors.
Now here's another brainteaser, if this one turns out to be impossible: what time on Shollenbarger's Clock will make the hands the closest to 120 degrees? 



#12
Jun1806, 03:35 PM

P: 15,325

Correct me of I'm wrong, but no one said they have to be at exact integer times, right?
Don't these three hands line up at 120 degrees from each hour approximately 11 times in every 12 hour period? (I'll leave it to others to determine the exact times.) 



#13
Jun1806, 05:09 PM

P: 546





#14
Jun1906, 12:30 AM

P: 546

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that there is no such time. To demonstrate, let's assume there is a time when the hands are all [tex]120^\circ[/tex] apart. Call the hour x, the minute y and the second z. Because of the format times are cited in, x and y must be integers.
Using these, we can express the angle at which each hand sits. The hour hand sits at [tex]\alpha = \left (\frac{x}{12} + \frac{y}{720} + \frac{z}{43200} \right)*360^\circ = 30x + \frac{y}{2} + \frac{z}{120}[/tex]. The minute hand sits at [tex]\beta = \left ( \frac{y}{60} + \frac{z}{3600} \right )*360^\circ = 6y + \frac{z}{10}[/tex]. And, the second hand sits at [tex]\gamma = 6z[/tex]. We set the second and minute hands [tex]120^\circ[/tex] apart by setting [tex]\beta = \gamma \pm 120[/tex]. This gives the condition [tex]y = \frac{59}{60} z \pm 20[/tex]. Since y must be an integer, z must be an integral multiple of 60/59. Thus, we can write [tex]z = \frac{60}{59}n[/tex] and [tex]y = n \pm 20[/tex], where n is an integer. Finally, to put the hour hand in the correct position, we set [tex]\alpha = \gamma \pm 240[/tex]. This reduces to the condition that [tex]x = \frac{11}{59} n \pm \frac{23}{2}[/tex]. We can see that, for x to be an integer, n must be valued such that [tex]\frac{11}{59} n[/tex] is an odd half integer. But, since 59 is odd and 11 and 59 are relatively prime, the only way for [tex]\frac{11}{59} n[/tex] to be an odd half integer is if n is an odd half integer multiple of 59  [tex]n = \frac{2m+1}{2} 59[/tex]. Since all factors in the numerator are odd, this can't be an integer. Thus, if n is an integer, x is not. Thus, there are no x, y, and z satisfying the relationships above such that x and y are both integers. 



#15
Jun1906, 01:33 AM

P: 29

x,y,z should be integers...........or atleast x and y should be integers(if u want to accept decimal seconds). further 0<= x <12....... 0<= y <60 and 0 <= z < 60........with these conditions u'll never get an appropriate answer 



#17
Jun1906, 08:46 AM

P: 5

I tried to clarify this earlier...
Decimal seconds are allowed. The seconds do not have to be integers. But give your answers with fractions. 



#18
Jun1906, 08:50 AM

P: 2,163

The answer is that the three hands never form 120 degree angles w.r.t each other. I have an inelegant solution. There are in fact, 22 times in a 12 hour period that the hour and minute hands are 120 degrees apart. It suffices to determine where the second hand is at those times. I did so and found that the second hand is never at the right place at the right time. Here are the results of a computer run. The first column is the time. The second column is the angle between the hour and minute hands. The third column is the angle between the minute and second hands. Take the first pair of lines for instance. Sometime between 00:21:49 and 00:21:50, the hour and minute hands were 120 degrees apart. However, at no time during that interval was the second hand near to 120 degrees from the minute hand. There is some symmetry in the data so that it turns out that with a little more analysis, you wouldn't need to check all 22 times. The closest approach is at 2:54:32 (and at 3 other times).
00:21:49 119.9917 163.1000 00:21:50 120.0833 169.0000 00:43:38 239.9833 33.8000 00:43:39 240.0750 27.9000 01:27:16 119.9667 67.6000 01:27:17 120.0583 61.7000 01:49:05 239.9583 264.5000 01:49:06 240.0500 258.6000 02:32:43 119.9417 61.7000 02:32:44 120.0333 67.6000 02:54:32 239.9333 135.2000 02:54:33 240.0250 129.3000 03:38:10 119.9167 169.0000 03:38:11 120.0083 163.1000 03:59:59 239.9083 5.9000 04:00:00 120.0000 0.0000 04:00:01 119.9083 5.9000 04:43:38 119.9833 33.8000 04:43:39 120.0750 27.9000 05:05:27 120.0250 129.3000 05:05:28 119.9333 135.2000 05:49:05 119.9583 264.5000 05:49:06 120.0500 258.6000 06:10:54 120.0500 258.6000 06:10:55 119.9583 264.5000 06:54:32 119.9333 135.2000 06:54:33 120.0250 129.3000 07:16:21 120.0750 27.9000 07:16:22 119.9833 33.8000 07:59:59 119.9083 5.9000 08:00:00 240.0000 0.0000 08:00:01 239.9083 5.9000 08:21:49 120.0083 163.1000 08:21:50 119.9167 169.0000 09:05:27 240.0250 129.3000 09:05:28 239.9333 135.2000 09:27:16 120.0333 67.6000 09:27:17 119.9417 61.7000 10:10:54 240.0500 258.6000 10:10:55 239.9583 264.5000 10:32:43 120.0583 61.7000 10:32:44 119.9667 67.6000 11:16:21 240.0750 27.9000 11:16:22 239.9833 33.8000 11:38:10 120.0833 169.0000 11:38:11 119.9917 163.1000 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
external flipflop chip to synchronize an external asynchronous input  Electrical Engineering  3  
a moving clock lags behind a stationary clock  Special & General Relativity  2  
Clock  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  8  
Clock in clock shop  General Discussion  11  
clock degrees homework  General Math  7 