## numberator or denometer??

good lord. im working on a lesson about instruments. and the the formula has a bunch of different fractions (eg/ tension fraction, length fraction, density fraction, etc.)

so they have one list of the "initial conditions" and then the other list of "final conditions".

and there seems to be no logic for the putting the initial or final conditions into the fractions.

like on question it'll suggest "since an increase in density results in a decrease in frequency, the density fraction will have the smaller density in the numerator"

and then on another question "since a decrease in density results in an increase in frequency, the density fraction will have a larger density in the numerator"

~Amy
 PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com >> Galaxies fed by funnels of fuel>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens>> Google eyes emerging markets networks
 I'm as confused as you are. I have no idea what experiment you or doing, and what density relates to what frequency. I might be able to help with more details. As far as I can tell, it's just trying to show you how proportionality and inverse proportionality work. For example $$f(x) = g(x) * (h(x))^{-1}$$ or also written $$f(x) = \frac{g(x)}{h(x)}$$. If we increase h(x) then f(x) will decrease because they are inversely proportional. If we increase g(x) then f(x) will increase because they are proportional. Is this it? If not, more details.
 Thread Tools

 Similar Threads for: numberator or denometer?? Thread Forum Replies General Math 9 Introductory Physics Homework 24