Thread Closed

Particular solution DE

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jul29-06, 07:10 AM   #1
 

Particular solution DE


Hi, I'm having trouble finding the particular solution of the following system.

[tex]
\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
{\mathop x\limits^ \bullet } \\
{\mathop y\limits^ \bullet } \\
\end{array}} \right] = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
1 & { - 1} \\
{ - 1} & 1 \\
\end{array}} \right]\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
x \\
y \\
\end{array}} \right] + \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
2 \\
{ - 5} \\
\end{array}} \right]
[/tex]

I found the complimentary function, it had some sines and cosines in it but I don't think that matters in terms of finding the particular solution. The independent variable t isn't present anywhere in the equation so I don't need to do any differentiation. If I set x' = y' = 0 (the prime denotes differentiation wrt t) then I end up with an 'inconsistent' set of equations, namely, x - y = 2 and x - y = 5. Can someone tell me how I can find the particular solution? Thanks.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Bird's playlist could signal mental strengths and weaknesses
>> Minus environment, patterns still emerge: Computational study tracks E. coli cells' regulatory mechanisms
>> Bacterium uses natural 'thermometer' to trigger diarrheal disease, scientists find
Jul30-06, 02:25 AM   #2
 
I would be leary of your complimentary solution as a first order system should usually be exponential not trigonometric. I will help you to find the complete solution, (complimentary + particular)

you'll want to use eigenvalues and vectors to "decouple" the equations

the way I solved it was to let:
{x;y}={phi}e^nt (where phis is the matrix of eigenvectors) and find the eigenvalues of the matrix [1 -1;-1 1] (the variable n is the eigenvalue)

do this by subsituting into the original equation.

at this point I will apologize for my unwillingness to use latex.

the eigenvalues are n= 0 and 2

the eigenvectors are then [1;1] and [1;-1]

let psi be the fundamental matrix = [1 e^2t;1 -e^2t]

now your equation is of the form:

(x;y)'=A(x;y)+f(t)

where f(t)=(2;5)
at this point I will introduce the missing function u(t) needed to solve the equation.

the solution is x=psi*u(t)
where psi*u'(t)=f(t)

solve for u1' and u2' and integrate to find u1 and u2

then [x;y]=psi*[u1;u2]
or
x=(7/2)*t+c1+.75+c2*e^2t
y=(7/2)*t+c1-.75-c2*e^2t

where c1 and c2 are determined by y'(0) and x'(0)

this solution is correct, substitute it back into the original equation if you are unsure (it satisfies the heck out of it)

hope this helps.
Jul30-06, 02:28 AM   #3
 
by the way

x=xc +xp

where xp=7/2*t+0.75
and xc=c1+c2e^2t

y of course is separated similarly.
Jul30-06, 04:38 AM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

Particular solution DE


Quote by lance
I would be leary of your complimentary solution as a first order system should usually be exponential not trigonometric. I will help you to find the complete solution, (complimentary + particular)
Let me clarify that: A linear system can have either exponential or trigonometric (or polynomial or some combination) solutions. In this case, since the coefficient matrix is symmetric and so has real eigenvalues, the complementary solution is exponential, not trigonometric.

Benny, recalculate the eigenvalues! Here, the problem is that one of the eigenvalues is 0 so one of the solutions to the associated homogeneous equation is the constant solution. Try a solution of the form
[tex]\left[ \begin{array}{c}At \\ Bt \end{array} \right][/tex]
Jul30-06, 05:36 AM   #5
 
Yep, the complimentary function should be in terms of exponentials, I mixed signs when I calculated the determinant.

Thanks for the suggestion HallsofIvy. Does the method of undetermined coefficients for single ODEs carry over to systems?

Edit: Hmm...I still get down to the problem of having an inconsistent system of equations. If I assume a solution of the form (At, Bt)^T and I plug it back into the matrix equation I end up with two equations.

A = At - Bt + 2
B = -At + Bt - 5

Rewriting this:

(A-B)t + (2-A) = 0...(1)
(B-A)t + (-5-B) = 0...(2)

Equating coefficients I get A - B = 0 so that A = B. But I also need A = 2 meaning that B = 2. But then -5-B wouldn't be zero.
Jul30-06, 02:43 PM   #6
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Sorry about that: you will need a particular solution of the form
[tex]\left[ \begin{array}{c}At \\ Bt+ C \end{array} \right][/tex]
Jul31-06, 02:47 AM   #7
 
Ok thanks I'll try that.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Particular solution DE
Thread Forum Replies
How to determine if the mixing of two solution would result in buffer solution? Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 3
pH of solution Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 1
Draft paper deriving a non-empty, stationary, axisymmetric solution solution of Einstein's Equations, based on the Lorentz Force Law General Physics 15
[SOLVED] Draft paper deriving a non-empty, stationary, axisymmetric solution solution General Physics 16
What is the solution of this? Differential Equations 26