Downward acceleration greater than g

  • Thread starter Thread starter mmfoley
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of acceleration due to gravity and whether an object can experience a downward acceleration greater than the acceleration of gravity (g). The original poster expresses confusion regarding the relationship between gravitational acceleration and air resistance, seeking clarification on the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how an object can have a downward acceleration greater than g, particularly in the context of falling and air resistance. Some participants clarify the distinction between speed and acceleration, while others introduce scenarios where acceleration can exceed g, such as in the case of a diving airplane.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes varying perspectives on the relationship between acceleration, speed, and air resistance. Some participants provide clarifications regarding the effects of air resistance on falling objects, while others explore different contexts where acceleration may exceed g. The conversation appears to be ongoing, with participants actively engaging in the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating complex concepts related to gravitational forces, air resistance, and the effects of moving towards the Earth's center. There are references to previous discussions and separate threads that may provide additional context to the questions raised.

mmfoley
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am taking a Natural and Physical Sciences course. As math and sciences aren't my strongest subjects, I am really struggling, reading things over and over again, and they are just not sinking in. For example, I understand the acceleration of gravity - g. I think that something can have a downward acceleration greater than g, - at least I think this is correct based on my notes, but I do not understand exactly how.

Would the following be accurate? – When an object first falls it is unbalanced, until the force of air resistance is large enough to balance the acceleration of gravity. So until it balances out, it is falling faster g. Since the object is falling down, this would mean that while unbalanced it has a downward acceleration greater than g.

Help!

Thank you!
mmfoley
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you are confusing speed with acceleration!

If there were no air resistance, the object would fall with acceleration g.

With air resistance, its acceleration is always less than g.

Since air resistance is proportional to speed, initially there will be very little resistance. The acceleration will be close to g, only very slightly less. As speed increases, so will air resistance so acceleration will go down. When speed is high enough that air resistance, upward, is equal to gravitational force, downward, (weight), the acceleration is 0,not g. The speed is now constant, not the acceleration.

Acceleration of a body falling through the air is initially g, then decreases to 0. It's speed is initially 0, then increases to it "terminal velocity".
 
It is, of course, possible, to go downward with acceleration greater than g but not "falling". An airplane, diving downward with its engine force added to the force of gravity, would have acceleration greater than g.
 
Thank you - one more question

Thank you for the help. Here is another question:

How do the mass and weight of an object at the Earth's center compare with their values at the Earth's surface?

I believe that as you move closer to the Earth's center you get the gravitational attraction effect, but that is about where my knowledge runs out on this topic.
 
You posted this as a separate thread and got very good answers there but I'll reply here.

As you move down into the earth, you are attracted only by the mass below you. It's a complicated calculation but it is possible to show that the gravitational attraction of the mass above you level cancels. Yes, since gravity depends on 1/R2, as you get closer to a mass gravitational pull (of that mass) increases but since volume (and so mass) below you depends on R3 the total gravitational pull (weight) depends on R3/R2= R. When R= 0, gravitational pull is 0.

The total gravitational pull at the center of the Earth is 0 because you are pulled equally in all directions. Your "weight" will be 0. Of course, your "mass" stays the same.
 
Thank you

Thank you for the quick response and help!

mmfoley
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K