## Keyboard problem

Here is the question:

 Many computer keyboards operate on the principle of capacitance. Each key forms a small parallel-plate capacitor whose separation is reduced when the key id depressed. Suppose the plates for each key have an area of 46.9 mm^2 and an initial separation of 0.550 mm. In addition, let the dielectric have a dielectric constant of 3.75. If the circuitry of the computer can detect a change in capacitance of 0.379 pF, what is the minimum distance a key must be depressed to be detected?
What I did in my attempt solve this is I substituted a lot of variables into one equation, but I still wasn't able to solve the problem. My equation was Farad = C/V = (EoA)^2k/Qd^2. I feel like I just went in a complete circle. Anyone know where I went wrong, or a different approach to solve this? Thanks in advance!
 PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com >> Galaxies fed by funnels of fuel>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens>> Google eyes emerging markets networks
 Admin One should be able to express capacitance as a function of the known variables and the distance. See - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ic/pplate.html

 Quote by Astronuc One should be able to express capacitance as a function of the known variables and the distance. See -http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/pplate.html
Yes, I tried to solve using my known variables. By plugging in A, K, and C into C = KEoA/d, and solving for d, I got 4106.847 mm. Do I just subtract the given initial distance of 0.550 mm from this to get a final answer of 4106.2937 mm?

## Keyboard problem

4106.847 mm = 4.1068 m, assuming mm = millimeter. This can't be right.

The answer should be fractions of mm, or on the order of microns.

One needs to check units, and it would help if one shows the forumula and substitutions.
 Hmm, okay, but is my number correct, except for the placement of the decimal? I keep getting the same answer :(.
 Recognitions: Gold Member Science Advisor Staff Emeritus It is "the correct answer," with the decimal point in the wrong place. Check your units. Remember that the value of epsilon-naught usually given in your textbook is in units of F/m, NOT F/mm. - Warren
 Here are the values I used: A = 0.0469 m^2 k = 3.75 C = 0.379 x 10^-12 F Eo = 8.85 x 10^-12 C^2/Nm^2 do = 0.00055 m d = ? Is the decimal placement in any of these incorrect?
 Recognitions: Gold Member Science Advisor Staff Emeritus You did not convert the area, 46.9 mm^2, into m^2 correctly. - Warren
 Oh, should it be 46.9 mm^2 = 46.9 x 10^-9 m^2?
 Recognitions: Gold Member Science Advisor Staff Emeritus No.. - Warren
 10^-6? Is that right?
 Recognitions: Gold Member Science Advisor Staff Emeritus 46.9 mm^2 = 4.69 × 10-5 m^2. (Divide by 10^3 * 10^3.) - Warren
 Thanks, so I got my answer to be 4.1068 x 10^-3m. Then do I subtract 0.550mm from this to get my final answer of 3.5568mm?
 Recognitions: Gold Member Science Advisor Staff Emeritus No, it's not that simple. You're on the right track though. First, calculate what the capacitance is at the initial spacing of 0.55 mm. Then, add 0.379 pF to it. Finally, find out the spacing that achieves that new, larger capacitance. The difference between the initial and final spacings is the distance the key must be pressed. - Warren
 So the capacitance at the initial spacing is 2.83 x 10^-12 F, and plus the 0.379pF is 3.209 x 10^-12 F. This initial capacitance is 0.485 mm. 4.1068 mm - 0.485 mm = 3.6218 mm, which is my final answer?
 Recognitions: Gold Member Science Advisor Staff Emeritus Uh, what? You found the initial capacitance and the final capacitance okay, but I don't know what you mean by "This initial capacitance is 0.485 mm" or where you got 0.485 mm. Please try to show your work in more detail. - Warren
 Sorry, I meant that is the distance. But is my final answer of 3.6216 mm correct?