Solution: Solve f(x)=x2+\int_0^x e^{-t}f(x-t)dt for f(x)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter himanshu121
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the integral equation f(x) = x² + ∫₀ˣ e⁻ᵗ f(x-t) dt. The user successfully transformed the integral using the substitution h = x - t, leading to the expression ∫₀ˣ e^(h-x) f(h) dh. By differentiating the original equation, they derived the first-order differential equation f'(x) = 2x + f(x). The solution was found to be f(x) = x² + (x³)/3, confirmed through the application of the fundamental theorem of calculus and integration techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral equations and their solutions
  • Familiarity with the fundamental theorem of calculus
  • Knowledge of differentiation techniques and integration factors
  • Basic concepts of Laplace transforms for solving differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of integrating factors for solving first-order differential equations
  • Explore Laplace transforms and their applications in solving integral equations
  • Learn about the properties of the fundamental theorem of calculus in more complex scenarios
  • Investigate advanced techniques for solving integral equations, such as the convolution theorem
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying differential equations, and anyone interested in advanced calculus and integral equations will benefit from this discussion.

himanshu121
Messages
649
Reaction score
1
[tex]f(x)=x^2+\int_0^x e^{-t}f(x-t)dt[/tex] ...(I)

Find f(x)

Okay what i did:

For
[tex]\int_0^x e^{-t}f(x-t)dt[/tex]

I substituted h=x-t =>dh=-dt
so [tex]\int_0^x e^{h-x}f(h)dh[/tex]

Now i differentiated (I)
so i got
f'(x)=2x+f(x) after solvin this by integrating factor method i got different results which involve ex

But i had to prove f(x)=x2+x3/3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The fundamental theorem of calculus says

[tex] \frac{d}{dx} \int_a^x f(h) \, dh = f(x)[/tex]

However, when you differentiate, you don't have something in this form! You have the form

[tex] \frac{d}{dx} \int_a^x f(\mathb{x,} h) \, dh[/tex]

Fortunately, in this case, you don't need the full messy version; you can factor [itex]e^{-x}[/itex] out of the integrand and then differentiate normally.
 
Thanks Hurkyl I got corrected

now i have f'(x)=x2+2x

which gives me the result

Still i want to know how would u have approached the pro
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K