Ram's Tricky Cardboard Challenge: What % Remains?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter himanshu121
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Ram's challenge involves a rectangular piece of cardboard from which he cuts the largest possible square, resulting in a new rectangle that maintains similarity to the original. The original rectangle has dimensions length l and width w, with w being less than l. The area of the remaining rectangle is calculated as w(l-w), leading to the conclusion that the remaining area is approximately 1 - (w/l) of the original area, confirming the properties of golden rectangles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geometric similarity
  • Familiarity with quadratic equations
  • Knowledge of area calculations for rectangles
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of golden rectangles in geometry
  • Learn how to solve quadratic equations effectively
  • Explore geometric similarity and its applications
  • Investigate area optimization problems in geometry
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry enthusiasts, educators, and students interested in advanced geometric concepts and problem-solving techniques.

himanshu121
Messages
649
Reaction score
1
Ram has a rectangular piece of card board out of which he clipped away the largest possible square and was left with a piece similar in shape to the original piece. The area of the piece remaining with Ram forms approx what percent of the original piece
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is a "golden rectangle" problem isn't it?

Let the original rectangle have length l and width w. We an assume that w< l. The largest square that can be cut from that is "w by w" leaving a rectangle of sides w and l-w.

Now which is larger, w or l-w? If we started with a skinny rectangle, in which l was not only larger than w but larger than 2w, l-w is still larger than w and saying that this new rectangle is similar to the orginal says that l/w= (l-w)/w (writing longer side over shorter for both rectangles). But that's the same as l= l-w which is impossible.

Thus, in the new rectangle, the longer side (corresponding to l in the original rectangle) has length w and the shorter l-w. Since the new rectangle is similar to the original, we have w/(l-w)= l/w or
w2= l2- lw. Dividing both sides by l2, (w/l)2= 1- w/l. We can think of this a quadratic equation and solve for w/l.

The area of the new rectangle is w(l-w)= lw- w2. The area of the original rectangle was lw. The new rectangle has area
(lw- w2)/lw= 1- (w/l).
 
Thanks Halls I knew i have to apply the prop u quoted but never applied it was just an odd time
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
23K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
21K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
17K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
13K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K