Explain Photons: Definition & Explanation

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gale
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain Photons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the definition and explanation of photons, exploring their nature as massless particles and their role in electromagnetic radiation. Participants delve into both quantum and wave perspectives, examining the implications of these characteristics on the behavior of light.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines a photon as the quantum of the electromagnetic field, describing it as a "little chunk" of electromagnetic energy that is transferred in whole multiples.
  • Another participant notes that light can be viewed as both particles (photons) and waves, highlighting that light exhibits no longitudinal vibration, which is linked to its massless nature.
  • The relationship between mass and speed is discussed, with the assertion that only massless particles can travel at the speed of light, as massive objects would require infinite energy to reach that speed.
  • A participant expresses interest in further clarification regarding the concept of energy increasing with speed and the notion of "proper" energy in massless particles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the fundamental characteristics of photons as massless particles and their role in electromagnetic radiation. However, there are unresolved questions regarding the implications of these properties, particularly concerning energy and speed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the definitions of energy and mass, as well as the implications of relativity on the behavior of photons. Some mathematical and conceptual aspects remain unexplored, particularly in relation to energy changes in massless particles.

Gale
Messages
683
Reaction score
1
Someone explain photons to me... please... I'm trying to imagine the whole massless particle thing... but i'd like a good definition of what a photon really is.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hey, welcome back Gale. Haven't seen you around for a while.

The photon is the quantum of the electromagnetic field. And a quantum is a little chunk (story is that when Planck was a student, the latin word quantum, meaning how much, was used for a chunk of anything, as in "Hey Hans, gimme a quantum of cheese").

So a quantum is a little chunk of action, but if you're not too cool with action, you can think of it as energy. A little bit of electromagnetic energy. Energy is only transferred in whole multiples of these chunks. Since light is a form of electromagnetic energy it is only transferred in whole number batches of these chunks; a light ray is a bunch of photons.

So light, and other forms of EM radiation like radio, microwave, and x-ray is made up of photons.

Now you can also think of light as EM waves and if you do that, experiment shows you something odd. In general waves can wave to and fro perpendicular to the direction of motion, or back and forth in the direction of motion. Waves in a rope that you swing from one end do the first, that is transverse vibration. Sound waves in air do the second, that is longitudinal vibration.

And the odd thing they discovered about light is that it has NO longitudinal vibration. Now working from the wave representation to the particle representation in the math, that turns out to mean the photon can't carry any mass. Any mass in the photon would mean a corresponding longitudinal amount of vibration, and there isn't any, up to some extremely delicate experiments.

Well it's a lucky thing the photon has no mass because relativity says, the only things that can travel at the speed of light are things that have no mass. You know that story, as a massive object goes faster and faster (relative to its starting point) its energy goes up and up and becomes infinite as the speed approaches light speed. But a massless particle has no proper energy to increase, so it can go at light speed - indeed it has to, because there can be no frame of reference in which it is truly at rest.

I'm going to stop now, and let you see if you want to ask more questions.
 
Originally posted by selfAdjoint


I'm going to stop now...

Doh - I was enjoying that!
 
yeah, i was enjoying too. it was just getting exciting!

but ok... i guess i'll ask a few questions...

so its a quantum. understood. massless, because it must be... now my questions...

>>

...actually... I've tried replying about thirty times now, and i can't ask any questions without completely changing the subject of the thread. soo... i'd say just continue where you left off love, it was good that way. just, point of clarity what do you mean when "its energy goes up" as its speed increases, and about how a massless particle has no "proper" energy to increase?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
18K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
High School The M paradox
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K