| Thread Closed |
"Physics is the only real science. The rest are just stamp collecting." |
Share Thread |
| Sep30-06, 02:54 AM | #1 |
|
|
"Physics is the only real science. The rest are just stamp collecting."
"Physics is the only real science. The rest are just stamp collecting."
-- Ernest Rutherford How valid is this statement. I think it has a lot of validity considering the fact that you are learning the fundamental laws of the universe and nature. You are basically studying the "Mind Of God". Where as other sciences such as social science, geology, biology and even chemistry are more specific into detail that may be more mundane that what physics teaches. Physics seems to be the big picture of science, and thus its essence as well. |
| Sep30-06, 07:08 AM | #2 |
|
|
A silly statement of Rutherford's indicative of the all-too common physicist's flaw of wholly unjustified arrogance.
The inability of physics to come up with any useful predictions within fields like biology or the social sciences (due to the mathematically unmanageable wealth of parameters involved) is a case in point. And who cares, really, whether a star light-years away from us has a lot higher density than our own sun (and that we may predict&compute it)? The activity to develop conceptual tools effective in the study of fields like biology or the social sciences is no less intellectually challenging than developing the mathematical tools usable in physics. Ingenious experiments must be thought out to show this or that in biology, and Emile Durkheim's thoughtful analysis of the suicide phenomenon must be considered good research. |
| Sep30-06, 07:48 AM | #3 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Of course physics explains the fundamental laws of the universe with the more fundamental field of Mathematics, if you want to go thataway.
|
| Sep30-06, 07:52 AM | #4 |
|
|
"Physics is the only real science. The rest are just stamp collecting."
Well, it is debatable if maths should be called a "science". In many respects, it is more akin to art/philosophy.
|
| Sep30-06, 08:22 AM | #5 |
|
|
maths is beautiful.
i agree though that statement isn't very good. shows a lot of arrogance. |
| Sep30-06, 10:11 AM | #6 |
|
|
i completely agree since the amount of mental gymanastics that is required
Mathmetics is only abstract unless it is being used in physics |
| Sep30-06, 10:33 AM | #7 |
|
|
I'm kind of opposed to the whole "physics is the holy grail" type thing..
It's done a very good job of explaining larger parts of the physical world, but what if there are other things to study? Like the mind and um, dare I say "soul?" |
| Sep30-06, 01:57 PM | #8 |
|
|
as far as I can tell, physics is the fundamental science. Chemistry and Biology can be broken down into physical systems, sure, but it seems like it would be a hassle and take more time, whereas biologists and chemists have excellent models of their systems that work well enough for scientific advancement.
Biology itself is one of the most diverse and fastly developing sicences right now, and its been very benficial to humanity. It wouldn't be like this if physicists were researching biology. It would take wayyyy longer. |
| Sep30-06, 02:03 PM | #9 |
|
|
It could've been influenced by the state of the other sciences compared to physics during Rutherford's time. (?)
|
| Sep30-06, 02:07 PM | #10 |
|
|
I know in the class, physical chemistry (required for chem majors) they use schroedinger's equation a lot. |
| Oct1-06, 03:11 AM | #11 |
|
|
One aspect about the mind that physics could probably never explain however is conscious self awareness. |
| Oct1-06, 04:21 AM | #12 |
|
|
I mean once we understand something completely there is no other way.. |
| Oct7-06, 08:23 AM | #13 |
|
|
I sort of think that some sciences are rooted in physics but they shouldn't be considered subordinate because of this. I think biology and chemistry are equally important as much as physics.
Although...cosmetic science is pretty useless (for the stupid shampoo commercials and skin crap on tv). I coukd argue some, like this science, are useless but ultmately, phyiscs, biology, and chemistry are the most important. |
| Oct7-06, 09:11 AM | #14 |
|
|
Hmm..cosmetic science makes a lot more people happy than theoretical physics ever did..
What you regard as "important" depends on which parameters you think define "importance". |
| Oct7-06, 11:45 AM | #15 |
|
|
Surely you jest? Theoretical Physicist Maxwell -> Hertz -> Marconi -> Electronics -> Radio, TV and Computers. Half the population doen't go to cosmetologists, but everybody watches TV and/or uses a computer. |
| Oct7-06, 11:46 AM | #16 |
|
|
Okay, I was sort of stretching the truth a bit, just for disagreement's sake.
![]() Besides, is television more important than an eyeliner?
|
| Oct7-06, 11:54 AM | #17 |
|
|
They needed Radio, need TV, and more recently the web, to advertise their products! They need photoshop->which runs on a computer-> to fool the people.
|
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: "Physics is the only real science. The rest are just stamp collecting."
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Stamp collecting and science | Biology | 1 | ||
| Help stamp out travel-time "distance"! | Cosmology | 9 | ||
| Quantum Physics and the "Real" World | Quantum Physics | 15 | ||
| Is Subatomic Physics a "Stamp Collection"? | General Physics | 3 | ||
| "The other quaternions": how useful are 2x2 real matrices to physics? | General Physics | 1 | ||