Thread Closed

Basis vectors

 
Share Thread
Oct6-06, 01:17 PM   #1
Bim
 

Basis vectors


For describing position of a particle we need vector coordinates r=(x,y,z). But when you go to higher physics like lagrangian formalism also basis vectors are introduced. The position vector then becomes r=xi+yj+zk, where i,j,k are basis vectors. Why do we have do do that? Why is not enough just to use the r=x+y+z?
PhysOrg.com physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Scientists moving 15-ton magnet from NY to Chicago
>> California scientist still reinventing the wheel at 94
>> Romania, EU launch works on world's most powerful laser
Oct6-06, 01:20 PM   #2
 
One doesn't need to lagrangian mech. to enounter, xi+yj+zk, newtonian would do. x+y+z is just a number, which is different from (x,y,z), an ordered triplet. The i,j,k specify the directions.
Oct6-06, 01:26 PM   #3
 
It's merely a notational preference.
Oct6-06, 01:45 PM   #4
Bim
 

Basis vectors


I did not mean it so simply. It has to do with equations of motion, that they are independent of basis. So any elaboration in this regard would be very much appreciated. Why do the equations of motion become independent of basis when we introduce the i,j,k vectors?
Oct6-06, 07:33 PM   #5
 
erg... xi+yj+zk is not independent of basis, the standard basis is being used here. i,j,k are e1,e2,e3.
xi+yi+zk=x(1,0,0)+y(0,1,0)+z(0,0,1)=(x,y,z)

or maybe im wrong, though this is how this things were shown in some books i have at home(30 years old or so, from uni of california)
Oct7-06, 07:10 AM   #6
 
It's because i,j,k are Cartesian rectangular co-ordiantes: the preferred basis for Newtonian mechanics. Newton's eqns. look ugly in anything other than Cartesian coordinates. So when doing Newton's physics in a Cartesian basis, the vectors themselves don't feature in the equations, so it appears as if they're not really there.

When doing physics in other co-ordinate systems, the basis vectors also appear in the equations. If you tried doing non-Lagrangian (i.e. simpler Newtonian mechanics) in a non-Cartesian basis the basis vectors would still feature. e.g. try finding the equations of motion in planar polar co-ordinates using just Newton and differentiating vectors: you'll (obviously) get the same result that Lagrangian mechanics would give you.

note: i've made the simple association with basis vectors and co-ordinate systems using the notion of the co-ordinate basis.
Oct7-06, 07:51 AM   #7
Bim
 
Thanks Masudr!
Thread Closed

Similar Threads for: Basis vectors
Thread Forum Replies
about basis vectors Special & General Relativity 12
standard basis vectors of C^n? Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
basis vectors Precalculus Mathematics Homework 9
Derivatives of basis vectors Advanced Physics Homework 6
Vectors basis Introductory Physics Homework 2