Register to reply

4x4 matrix determinant

by ultima9999
Tags: determinant, matrix
Share this thread:
ultima9999
#1
Nov13-06, 08:06 AM
P: 43
Use row and/or column operations to simplify the determinant of the following matrix A, by reduction to upper triangular form, then evaluate.
[tex]A = \left(\begin{array}{cccc}
2 & 3 & 4 & 5\\
0 & -1 & 2 & 1\\
0 & 0 & 2 & 4\\
0 & 3 & -6 & 0
\end{array}
\right)[/tex]

Is there an simpler way to find the determinant so that I don't have to expand cofactors etc? Because it would be: 2|(3x3 matrix)| - 3|(3x3 matrix| + 4|(3x3 matrix)| - 5|(3x3 matrix)| and then I have to find the determinants of each 3x3 matrix...
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
An interesting glimpse into how future state-of-the-art electronics might work
Tissue regeneration using anti-inflammatory nanomolecules
C2D2 fighting corrosion
radou
#2
Nov13-06, 08:15 AM
HW Helper
radou's Avatar
P: 3,220
Yes, there is a simpler way, and the text of the problem itself suggests which way it is. Investigate row and column operations and try to solve the problem.
ultima9999
#3
Nov13-06, 08:21 AM
P: 43
I have reduced to this:


[tex]A = \left(\begin{array}{cccc}
1 & 1.5 & 2 & 2.5\\
0 & 1 & -2 & -1\\
0 & 0 & 1 & 2\\
0 & 0 & 0 & 1
\end{array}
\right)[/tex]

How would I determine the determinant using this?

radou
#4
Nov13-06, 08:25 AM
HW Helper
radou's Avatar
P: 3,220
4x4 matrix determinant

Good work. You can evaluate the determinant by using the fourth row now.
ultima9999
#5
Nov13-06, 08:48 AM
P: 43
The determinant would be 1.

However, the answer is listed as -12, and the second part is to check my answer by expanding the third row of the determinant. I'm at a loss as to what to do now.
radou
#6
Nov13-06, 08:56 AM
HW Helper
radou's Avatar
P: 3,220
Quote Quote by ultima9999
The determinant would be 1.

However, the answer is listed as -12, and the second part is to check my answer by expanding the third row of the determinant. I'm at a loss as to what to do now.
Then something went wrong with your row/column operations. Actually, I reduced it to an upper triangular form in 3 steps with row operations only. Its easy, go through it one more time.
HallsofIvy
#7
Nov13-06, 07:23 PM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,503
You had better have kept track of your divisors while row reducing. Dividing one row by a number divides the determinant by that number.
Swapping two rows multiplies the determinant by -1. Add a multiple of one row to another does not change the determinant.

Starting with
[tex]\left(\begin{array}{cccc}2 & 3 & 4 & 5\\0 & -1 & 2 & 1\\0 & 0 & 2 & 4\\0 & 3 & -6 & 0\end{array}\right)[/tex]
since the first column is already 0's (except for the first row), start on the second column: add 3 times the second row to the fourth row to get
[tex]\left(\begin{array}{cccc}2 & 3 & 4 & 5\\0 & -1 & 2 & 1\\0 & 0 & 2 & 4\\0 & 0 & 0& 3\end{array}\right)[/tex]
Now we have an upper triangular matrix: it's determinant is just the product of the numbers on the main diagonal:2(-1)(2)(3)= -12. Since the only row operation used was "add a multiple of one row to another", that is the determinant of the original matrix.
ultima9999
#8
Nov13-06, 10:03 PM
P: 43
I realised that I reduced to upper triangular row echelon form rather than just upper triangular form.

The next part asks me to check this determinant by expanding the third row. How do I go about expanding it? Would it be using cofactors etc.?
HallsofIvy
#9
Nov14-06, 06:06 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,503
Yes, that's what "expanding" a determinant means. Using the third row is particularly easy since it has only 2 non-zero numbers.
-JACK-
#10
Jul24-08, 11:25 PM
P: 1
I thought I'd mention
that the -12 seems to
be the right answer, because
I am getting -48 + 48 -12 + many zero terms,
so -12 seems right.
I am using a pictoral technique
from post#7 from this forum:
http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewto...d=95302#p95302
(I made that red/black diagram, so I was checking
my work with this example)
HallsofIvy
#11
Jul25-08, 04:19 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,503
Jack, this thread is two years old! And it was said two years ago that -12 is the determinant.
phibins
#12
Oct17-10, 06:09 PM
P: 1
Quote Quote by ultima9999 View Post
.....Because it would be: 2|(3x3 matrix)| - 3|(3x3 matrix| + 4|(3x3 matrix)| - 5|(3x3 matrix)| and then I have to find the determinants of each 3x3 matrix...
You should know that you can take the determinant along any column as well as any row, so the obvious choice here is to thake the det. along column 2,0,0,0.

this way you end up with 2|(3x3 matrix)| - 0|(3x3 matrix| + 0|(3x3 matrix)| - 0|(3x3 matrix)|
so now the det is 2 times the determinant of the remaining matrix

-1, 2, 1
0, 2, 4
0, 0, 3

Which is -6, and -6*2= -12.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Determinant of matrix Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
Matrix determinant Calculus & Beyond Homework 8
Determinant of a 3X3 matrix Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Matrix determinant Precalculus Mathematics Homework 4
Matrix determinant Introductory Physics Homework 9