Can Arcsin(i2x) be Simplified to iArcsin(2x)?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gunni
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the simplification of the expression Arcsin(i2x) and whether it can be treated as iArcsin(2x). Participants explore implications of complex numbers in trigonometric functions, particularly in the context of deriving a formula for the length of a parabola.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the identity sin(ix) = isin(x) holds, suggesting that sin(ix) actually equals i*sinh(x).
  • One participant expresses a desire to simplify Arcsin(i2x) to iArcsin(2x) to avoid complex numbers in their calculations.
  • Another participant points out that the length of a function is typically referred to as arc length, not just length, and provides the formula for arc length.
  • There is a suggestion that the arc length of a parabola involves a tricky integral, with one participant providing a substitution method for solving it.
  • Some participants clarify terminology and express confusion over the language used in mathematical discussions, particularly regarding the translation of terms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the simplification of Arcsin(i2x) to iArcsin(2x). There are competing views on the properties of sine and its behavior with complex arguments, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the validity of the proposed simplification.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the properties of sine and arcsine functions when extended to complex numbers. The mathematical steps involved in deriving the arc length of a parabola are also not fully resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and enthusiasts of calculus, complex analysis, and those exploring the properties of trigonometric functions in relation to complex numbers.

Gunni
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Quick question.

[tex]sin(-x) = -sin(x)[/tex]

this can be seen as this example:

[tex]sin(i^2x) = i^2sin(x)[/tex]

Does this then apply?

[tex]sin(ix) = isin(x)[/tex] ?

I'm trying to derive a formula for the length of a simple parabola. Unfortunetly in my calculations I end up with Arcsin(i2x) along the way and it would make my life a lot simpler if that could be treated as iArcsin(2x). Then the i would be divided out and then I'd get a real number instead of a complex number.

It's sort of a dare, I'm taking the calculus course where we learn about complex numbers but I read the book during the christmas vacation so I've got most of the basics down. Right now we're learning about the length of functions and we asked if our teacher would give us an example using a parabola of the form Ax^2 + C, but she said it was too complex. Of course, once she says that we spend the rest of the week trying to do it by ourselfes. :wink:

Thanks a lot.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try plugging ix into the definition of the sin function (e^ix-e^(-ix))/2i. You'll find that you get sin(ix) = i*sinh(x) not i*sin(x).
 
Isn't that the definition of the sinh function? I always thought sin was defined as a/c in a triangle with one 90° corner.
 
Originally posted by Gunni
Quick question.

[tex]sin(-x) = -sin(x)[/tex]

this can be seen as this example:

[tex]sin(i^2x) = i^2sin(x)[/tex]

Does this then apply?

[tex]sin(ix) = isin(x)[/tex] ?

absolutely not

I'm trying to derive a formula for the length of a simple parabola. Unfortunetly in my calculations I end up with Arcsin(i2x) along the way and it would make my life a lot simpler if that could be treated as iArcsin(2x). Then the i would be divided out and then I'd get a real number instead of a complex number.

It's sort of a dare, I'm taking the calculus course where we learn about complex numbers but I read the book during the christmas vacation so I've got most of the basics down. Right now we're learning about the length of functions and we asked if our teacher would give us an example using a parabola of the form Ax^2 + C, but she said it was too complex. Of course, once she says that we spend the rest of the week trying to do it by ourselfes. :wink:

Thanks a lot

What;s the length of a function?
 
[tex]L = \int_{a}^{b}\sqrt(1 + (f'(x))^2)dx[/tex]

Anyway, thanks guys. Too bad that doesn't apply, seems the damn teacher was right. :smile:
 


Originally posted by matt grime

What;s the length of a function?

Since this is calculus I would guess that he's talking about the arclength. In complex analysis it's more likely to be a line integral.

Of course, the arc length of a parabola is IIRC not so bad except for the tricky integral:

[tex]\int_a^b \sqrt{\frac{dy}{dx}^2+1}dx[/tex]
so
[tex]\int_a^b \sqrt{4x^2+1} dx[/tex]
which leads to the naive substitution
[tex]x(u)=\frac{i\sin(u)}{2}[/tex]
so
[tex]\int_a^b cos(u) dx[/tex]
but it needs to be inverted to get the correct limits of integration:
[tex]\int_{-\sin^{-1}(2ia)}^{-\sin^{-1}{2ib}}<br /> (1+\frac{i}{2}) \cos(u) du[/tex]
[tex](1+\frac{i}{2}) |_{-\sin^{-1}(2ia)}^{-\sin^{-1}{2ib}} -sin u[/tex]
so
[tex](1+\frac{i}{2})(2b-2a)i[/tex]
resulting in the arc length:
[tex](a-b)+i2(b-a)[/tex]

Unfortunately this is a less than ideal result. Perhaps he should try the substitution:
[tex]x=\frac{1}{2}\tan(u)[/tex]
instead.
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by Gunni
[tex]L = \int_{a}^{b}\sqrt(1 + (f'(x))^2)dx[/tex]

Anyway, thanks guys. Too bad that doesn't apply, seems the damn teacher was right. :smile:

that isn't the 'length of a function'. it is the arc length. is your teacher really talking about lengths of functions?


as nate points out it is realtively easily to find in the case of a parabola.
 
I'm sorry, I'm from Iceland and math is tought in icelandic, so I don't know all the english names for functions.

I'll look over what NateG posted tomorrow (kind of late here at GMT), since I've run into trouble deriving it myself the least I can do is learn how to do it properly. Thanks guys.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
806
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K