| Thread Closed |
Non-Seperable ODE Help |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Nov23-06, 01:22 PM | #1 |
|
|
Non-Seperable ODE Help
Hey,
I've been teaching myself some DEs that I can use for physics and whatnot. I am comfertable with seperable equations, but I can't figure out how to solve this problem. Let's assume we have some rocket with thrust F(t) and drag r(v), plus acceleration due to gravity, g=9.8 m/s/s. Overall acceleration: (m is the mass, assume constant) [tex]a(t)=\frac{F(t)}{m} - \frac{r(v)}{m} - g[/tex] [tex]\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{F(t)}{m} - \frac{r(v)}{m} - g[/tex] Now as you can see, we can't move dt over to the other side, because there are multiple terms there. Can we simply distribute it across them, and get: [tex]\int{dv}=\int{\frac{F(t)dt}{m}} - \int{\frac{r(v)dt}{m}} - \int{gdt}[/tex] Also, we neet to relate v to t in the r(v) term, but we don't have a v(t)... Thanks, -Jack Carrozzo jack _{at}_ crepinc.com http://www.crepinc.com/ |
| Nov23-06, 03:02 PM | #2 |
|
|
You effectively have a second-order equation, with a generalized function of the first derivative. You will need to be more specific about r(v) if you want to make any progress. If r(v) is linear, you're in luck - otherwise it may be quite tough to solve.
|
| Nov23-06, 07:28 PM | #3 |
|
|
[tex]r(v)=(\frac{1}{2}rAc)v^2[/tex]
or simply [tex]r(v)=kv^2[/tex] which is not linear, per se. How would I go about this? Thanks, -Jack Carrozzo jack _{at}_ crepinc.com http://www.crepinc.com/ |
| Nov23-06, 08:37 PM | #4 |
|
|
Non-Seperable ODE Help
I'd wager that you could probably use an integrating factor type equation or something along those lines.
|
| Nov23-06, 08:46 PM | #5 |
|
|
Hm... I looked that up at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IntegratingFactor.html
Any idea what sort of function I'm looking for to make that integrable? -Jack Carrozzo jack _{at}_ crepinc.com http://www.crepinc.com/ |
| Nov23-06, 09:20 PM | #6 |
|
|
Sorry - my bad. What you actually have (if r(v) is proportional to v^2) is a Riccati equation of the form
[tex]v^{\prime} + v^2 + f(t) = 0 [/tex] in v (give or take a constant or two). This is not generally soluble for any f(t). One thing you can do is make the transformation [tex]v = \frac{u^{\prime}}{u}[/tex] and sub, giving you the Hill equation [tex]u^{\prime \prime} + f(t) u = 0 [/tex] which only helps if you actually know a solution and can therefore work backwards. There are solutions of this Riccati equation for specific forms of f(t) - perhaps if you could give us some clue what the thrust term might be, we could explore it further. sorry for the first (slightly misleading) post. edit: as a guide to what sort of Riccati equations are soluble, you can check out http://eqworld.ipmnet.ru/en/solutions/ode/ode-toc1.htm as they have some special cases listed. |
| Nov23-06, 09:36 PM | #7 |
|
|
Thanks, I need to let that sink in for a bit before I can try to apply it.
Which come to think of it may work.... if we solve the problem with T constant from t=0 to 0.5, then 0.5 to 2.5 and 6.5, each time carrying v0, perhaps we could solve it. What do you think? -Jack Carrozzo jack _{at}_ crepinc.com http://www.crepinc.com/ |
| Nov23-06, 09:46 PM | #8 |
|
|
By the way - the equation is slightly doubtful - for a rocket you need to include the loss of mass due to fuel expenditure. Therefore m = m(t). You'll have to think about how this fits in - i.e., is the rate of fuel loss proportional to time?
Basically, you have to resort to a momentum equation, e.g. [tex] \frac{d (m(t)v)}{dt} = F(t) - r(v) - m(t)g [/tex] |
| Nov23-06, 10:37 PM | #9 |
|
|
I was using the assumption that the mass lost compared to the total mass of the vehicle was negligable in order to make calculations easier, but if I were to include it, it would be some function of the form
[tex]m(t)=m_{v} - km_{p0}t[/tex] or the mass of the vehicle plus the initial mass of the propellant decreasing linearly with time. -Jack Carrozzo jack _{at}_ crepinc.com http://www.crepinc.com/ |
| Nov23-06, 10:52 PM | #10 |
|
|
^actually you'll have
dp/dt=dm/dt v +dv/dt m so you can plug in the terms that give you the force. F(t)-r(v)=v dm/dt + m dv/dt so F(t)- r(v)- v dm/dt = m dv/dt so F(t)/m(t) -r(v)/m(t) -v/m(t) dm/dt =a as I recall rocketry problems are usually solved by a series of applications of newtons laws and conservation of energy, ie no plug and play differential equations. |
| Nov23-06, 11:09 PM | #11 |
|
|
out of curiosityin this problem is it allowed for us to assume that the rocket is incredibly massive in comparison to its fuel, thus assuming that mass is a constant?
also this appears to form an integral equation with integral r(v) dt= v + q(t) where q(v) is all of the other t terms grouped together. I think an equation of this form can usually be solved with a laplace transform correct? |
| Nov23-06, 11:44 PM | #12 |
|
|
truthfully I've never heard of laplace transforms, so I'll take your word for it.
I've only ever seen the problem addressed as a numerical method wherein each part is solved for some small dt. I wanted to do it with diff EQs if possible. Thanks guys -Jack Carrozzo jack _{at}_ crepinc.com http://www.crepinc.com/ |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Non-Seperable ODE Help
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Seperable Equation | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 7 | ||
| Seperable equations | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 5 | ||
| Can't figure out this seperable diffEQ! :( | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 5 | ||
| If you have the seperable DE.... | Introductory Physics Homework | 1 | ||
| Seperable Differentiation. Help, please. =\ | Introductory Physics Homework | 8 | ||