Solving the Sum of Squares of 3 Consecutive Odd Numbers

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ruud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Squares Sum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the sum of the squares of any three consecutive odd numbers, represented as \( n^2 + (n + 2)^2 + (n + 4)^2 \), yields a remainder of 11 when divided by 12. The correct approach involves substituting \( n \) with \( 2k + 1 \), simplifying the expression to \( 12n^2 + 36n + 35 \), and confirming that 35 divided by 12 results in a remainder of 11. This method clarifies the misunderstanding regarding the division statement and the role of the variable \( x \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic expressions and simplification
  • Familiarity with modular arithmetic, specifically division and remainders
  • Knowledge of odd integers and their representation as \( n = 2k + 1 \)
  • Basic experience with polynomial expansion and simplification
NEXT STEPS
  • Study modular arithmetic and its applications in number theory
  • Learn about polynomial expansion techniques and simplification methods
  • Explore proofs involving sums of squares and their properties
  • Investigate the generalization of odd number properties in algebraic contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in number theory, particularly those studying properties of odd integers and modular arithmetic.

ruud
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm getting confused and can't seem to wrap my head around this problem. Prove that the sum of the squares of any 3 consecutive odd numbers when divided by 12 gives a remainder of 11.

I'm not sure how to set this up or proceed I figured that

(n^2 + (n +2)^2 + (n+4)^2)/12 = x + 11


Where n is any odd integer

then I got

3n^2 +12n + 20 = 12x +123
3n(n+4) = 12x + 103
I'm not sure where to take it from here
Can someone start out on an alternate solution or set it up differently for me?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
you will get a lot further if you let n=2k+1 which is always what you should do when asked to consider odd numbers


the bit where you write x+11 is wrong, as that isn't what 'has remainder 11 on dividing by 12' means.

omit the x entirely

look at the line 3n^2 +12n + 20

this has the same remainder as 3n^2 +20, now put n=2k+, and remember 12 = 0 mod 12.
 
(2n+1)^2 + (2n+3)^2 + (2n+5)^2
after expanding and simplifying
12n^2 + 36n + 35

as you see, 12 goes into 12n^2 evenly, as does 12 into 36...so far so good

and then we come to 35...35/12 = 2 + 11R...there is your 11

ie.

in general terms f[unction](n)=d[ivisor](n)q[uotient](n) + r[emainder](n)
where n is a positive integer

so the division statement would be:
12n^2 + 36n + 35 = (12)(n^2 + 3n + 2) + 11
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K