Calculating Work Done by a Spring with Initial Compression

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by a spring in a scenario where a block is initially compressed against the spring. The problem involves a 3-kg block resting on a 2-kg block supported by a spring, with the goal of determining the maximum velocity and height of the lower block after the upper block is removed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply energy conservation principles but expresses confusion regarding the correct formulation of work done by the spring. Some participants suggest using conditions for maximum velocity and exploring kinetic energy as a function of position. Others raise questions about the signs in the equations and the interpretation of forces acting on the blocks.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different approaches to the problem, including energy conservation and force balance. There is an acknowledgment of potential sign errors in the equations, and some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of work done by the spring and the conditions for maximum velocity.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted complexity regarding the initial compression of the spring and how it affects the calculations. Participants are also discussing the implications of negative and positive signs in their equations, which adds to the confusion surrounding the work done by the spring.

AngelofMusic
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hello!

Sorry I've got so many questions lately. Studying for a midterm right now. Anyway, I've been trying to solve problems involving springs, and I'm getting confused about calculating the work done by a spring when its initial state is already in compression.

The question: A 3-kg block rests on top of a 2-kg block supported by but not attached to a spring with k = 40N/m. The upper block is suddenly removed. Determine the maximum velocity and the maximum height of the 2-kg block.

I figured that the maximum velocity would occur before the block flew off the spring, and probably before it returned to its unstretched length.

In equation: T1 + U1->2 = T2

[tex]U1->2 = 1/2k(x1)^2 - 1/2k(x2)^2[/tex], where x1 and x2 are measured from the unstretched length of the spring.

I calculated x1 = 1.22625 m. So:

[tex]0 + 30.07 J - 1/2k(x2)^2 = 1/2mv^2[/tex]

Taking the derivative and setting it to zero:

-k(x2)=0, which isn't correct. How am I supposed to approach this problem? I think my equation for work done by the spring is incorrect, but I don't know what it is supposed to be.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a couple of options:

A clever option is to realize that the velocity is maximal when the net force on the block is zero, so when [tex]mg=kx[/tex] and then use energy.

Alternatively, you can calculate the Kinetic Energy as a function of position:
[tex]E_k=\frac{1}{2}kx_0^2-\frac{1}{2}kx^2-mg(x-x_0)[/tex]
then take the derivative and set it to zero since the kinetic energy is maximal when the velocity is maximal.
[tex]kx-mg=0[/tex]
so
[tex]mg=kx[/tex] (have I seen this equation before?)
[tex]x=\frac{mg}{k}[/tex]

You could also calculate an expression for the velocity, take a derviative, and then work your way back, but it's not nearly as nice in this case:
[tex]v=\sqrt{\frac{2}{m}(\frac{1}{2}kx_0^2-\frac{1}{2}kx^2-mg(x-x_0))[/tex]
for velocity as a function of position.
 
Thanks for your help!

Just a quick follow-up on the signs of the equations. When you have:

[tex]E_k=\frac{1}{2}kx_0^2-\frac{1}{2}kx^2-mg(x-x_0)[/tex]

Wouldn't the result be:

-kx - mg = 0

This is always a confusing point for me. I never know when the spring force is considered negative/positive, and whether the work done is negative or positive.

In this case, the spring is going back towards its original position, so I'd say it's positive. How does that translate numerically into the equation?

[tex]E_spring = \frac{1}{2}kx_0^2 - \frac{1}{2}kx^2[/tex]

Since it was originally compressed by 1.22625 m, [tex]x_0[/tex] = -1.22625 and x = 0.4905 when I set mg = kx. Since the values are squared, though, I'm still getting a negative since the x values are sqared.
 
Oh the maximum velocity is definitely at:
[tex]x=-\frac{mg}{k}[/tex]
since the other solution with [tex]x>0[/tex] is not in the domain where the function is meaningfull.

I had a sign error. Good question/catch.

I'm not sure if you've seen work integrals but essentially, the work can be described as
[tex]W=\int \vec{F}_{net} \dot{} v dt[/tex]
and if you use the same coordinate system for everything, you'll get the correct sign.

Alternatively, work done by forces in the same direction as the velocity is positive, and work done by forces opposing the velocity is negative.

Regading the math, even with the sign error:
[tex](x_0^2-x^2) > 0[/tex]

Here's what I get using approximations:
[tex]x_0=-1.2[/tex] (Negative since down is negative)
[tex]x_{vmax}=-.5[/tex]
now
[tex]x_0^2=1.44[/tex]
[tex]x_{vmax}^2=.25[/tex]
so
[tex]v_{max}=\frac{2}{2} \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}40(1.19) - mg(-.7)}[/tex]
[tex]v_{max}=\sqrt{23.8-14}=\sqrt{10}[/tex]
so I get
[tex]v_{max}=3[/tex]
or so.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K