| Thread Closed |
numerical analysis (composite numerical integration) |
Share Thread |
| Dec28-06, 09:20 AM | #1 |
|
|
numerical analysis (composite numerical integration)
using composite trapezoidal rule with n=4 how can i get a bound for the error of I=integration tan(x) from x=0 to x=pi/2
i know that the term of error in comp trapezoidal rule is (b-a)/12 h^2 f''(eita) i got the second derevative of tanx to be 2sec^2 x tanx then i don't know with what value exactly i need to substitute in this function to get the bound. |
| Jan2-07, 11:35 AM | #2 |
|
|
Since tan(pi/2) is infinite, you cannot perform this integration.
|
| Jan2-07, 11:39 AM | #3 |
|
|
sorry it is to x=pi/4
should i substitute by sec^2x by (1+tan^2x) |
| Jan2-07, 11:53 AM | #4 |
|
|
numerical analysis (composite numerical integration)If you want a worst case error, differentiate again and find the value of [tex]\eta[/tex] that maximizes f''. |
| Jan2-07, 01:20 PM | #5 |
|
|
ok i did and the second derivative is 2sec^2 x tanx now is the maximum value of this function is 4 as sec^2(x)=tan^2(x) + 1 ??????????????
|
| Jan2-07, 03:09 PM | #6 |
|
|
Taking the derivative of f'' and setting it to zero gives an immaginary root. So, there is no point of maximum.
The value of f'' at [tex]\pi/4[/tex] is 1, so we take it as the worst case. [tex]h = \pi/4/4 = \pi/16[/tex] Then your error will be less then [tex]\frac{\pi/4}{12}\cdot \frac{\pi^2}{16^2}[/tex]. |
| Jan3-07, 02:50 AM | #7 |
|
|
why we set the value of f'' to zero???
we set it to a value that gives us the maximum of the function so we substitute in 2sec^2(x)tan(x) which is equal to 2(1+tan^2(x))tan(x) by PI/4 so we get 2(1+1) which is 4. right?? |
| Jan3-07, 04:34 AM | #8 |
|
|
Since f''' has no real roots the maximum of f'' must be at one of its boundary points 0 or [tex]\pi/4[/tex]. The value of the funtion at 0 is 0 and at [tex]\pi/4[/tex] is 4 (and not 1 as I wrote previously). So in the expression for the error, you replace [tex]f''(\eta)[/tex] by 4, getting [tex]\frac{\pi/4}{12}\cdot \frac{\pi^2}{16^2}\cdot 4[/tex] |
| Jan4-07, 05:06 AM | #9 |
|
|
ok what about f(x)=exp x sinx using composite trapezoidal rule what is the bound of error for integration from 1 to 3
the second derevative will be 2exp x cos x then to get the bound of error which value should i substitute with?? |
| Jan4-07, 05:14 AM | #10 |
|
|
|
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: numerical analysis (composite numerical integration)
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| how much numerical analysis do we need? | Academic Guidance | 9 | ||
| numerical analysis | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 1 | ||
| Numerical Analysis | Calculus | 7 | ||
| Numerical Analysis | General Math | 1 | ||
| Numerical Analysis | General Math | 6 | ||