Pumpkin Swing: Calculating Speed at θ=30°, L=5m, g=9.8m/s2, m=10kg

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsgivesmeCs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Swing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a pumpkin swinging from a pendulum at an angle of 30 degrees, given specific parameters such as length, mass, and gravitational acceleration. Participants explore energy conservation principles and the geometry involved in determining height and speed, with a focus on potential and kinetic energy relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for the speed of the pumpkin at the bottom of its swing, given the parameters.
  • Another suggests using an energy argument, proposing that potential energy plus kinetic energy is constant.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the problem and attempts to apply energy conservation, leading to a calculation that results in a speed of 7 m/s.
  • One participant critiques the expression for potential energy used by another, suggesting that the angle must be included in the calculations.
  • There is a discussion about the correct triangle to use for calculating height, with one participant describing their method and another offering a clearer approach to visualize the problem.
  • A participant calculates a height of 1.25 m from the bottom point and seeks confirmation of this value.
  • Another participant shares a diagram to illustrate their approach to the problem, using the laws of sine to determine height.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the triangle's dimensions and the correct assignment of values to sides.
  • One participant recalculates the height from the bottom point to be 0.66 m, leading to a new speed calculation of 3.6 m/s using potential energy equations.
  • A participant confirms the correctness of the final calculation, expressing satisfaction with the assistance received.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants engage in a collaborative exploration of the problem, with some expressing confusion and seeking clarification. While there is agreement on the use of energy conservation principles, there is no consensus on the initial expressions for potential energy or the correct geometric approach until later in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants navigate through various assumptions regarding height calculations and the geometry of the pendulum swing. There are unresolved aspects related to the initial potential energy expression and the specific triangle configurations used in the calculations.

physicsgivesmeCs
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How fast is the pumpkin moving at the bottom if theta = 30 degrees, L = 5 m, g = 9.8 m/s^2, m = 10 kg.

L is the length of the string holding the pumpkin. M is the mass of the pumpkin. It's like a pendulum, the pumpkin is positioned at 30 degrees from the vertical and let go. Assume no air resistance/friction.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why don't you try an energy argument?

potential + kinetic energy = constant

cookiemonster
 
could you please explain what you mean a little? I am lost with that problem, too.

This is what I'm thinking, but i don't know what to do with the angle and all and if I'm doing this correctly or not:

TE = PE + KE
PE = KE
mgh = mv^2
sqrt ((mgh)/m) = v
sqrt (gh)= v
sqrt (9.8m/s^2 * 5.0m) = v
v = 7 m/s

Please help me if you can, thanks in advance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your approach is good, but your expression for potential energy is not correct.

Let the position at theta = 0 (hanging straight down) have a potential of 0. So now the question is, "If the pendulum is at an angle of 30 degrees, how high is the bob?" Why don't you draw a triangle?

cookiemonster
 
Originally posted by cookiemonster
Your approach is good, but your expression for potential energy is not correct. Try to see if you can't include the angle in there.

cookiemonster

can't or can?
 
I hadn't read your post carefully enough to realize you needed help with the angle. I edited my post to include some helpful information.

And just for a fun little exercise in English, the sentences with "can" and "can't" mean exactly the same thing!

cookiemonster
 
Last edited:
if i did it right, i got 1.25m high from the bottom point, is that correct?
 
What triangle did you use?

cookiemonster
 
Hold on, i am about to post up the picture i drew

http://mysite.verizon.net/vze3ss2y/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/pumpkin.jpg

i used the big triangle to find the hypotenuse of the small triangle (circled in green) then i used the laws of sine to determine the height of da pumpkin from the bottom point where PE = 0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Well, I'm not quite sure I understand your triangle. I'll describe the one you're going to want to use:

We're going to let the string and bob form the hypotenuse. So the hypotenuse will always have length 5. Additionally, we want to get a value for y, so the other two sides will be in the up-down direction and left-right direction. Since we want the up-down and left-right dimensions to form a triangle with the string, put the up-down side directly below the place where the string is hanging and the left-right side right to the side of the bob. I assume the angle is of the hypotenuse off of the up-down side, so the angle on the top of this triangle will be 30. Now you can calculate the y height.

Just remember that this is the height from the top, whereas you're looking for the height from the bottom.

Edit: In response to your post and diagram (I understand it now), you're assigning the value of 5 to the wrong side. Your approach can work, but it's more difficult than it needs to be.

cookiemonster
 
  • #11
could you please post a picture of what you're trying to say?


edit: wait i think i know what you're talking about now
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Hope it works... I don't have a webspace of my own (that I know how to use).

cookiemonster
 

Attachments

  • new bitmap image.jpg
    new bitmap image.jpg
    1.9 KB · Views: 443
  • #13
thanks for the picture, it is very helpful.

Ok, so when i solve for the adjacent side (up-down), i get 4.33m from the top, meaning the pendulum is .66m from the bottom. So when i solve the problem to find the velocity, for height in PE = mgh, i use .66m to get:

PE = KE
mgh = .5mv^2
gh = .5v^2
sqrt (gh/.5) = v
sqrt ((9.8m/s^2 * .66m)/.5) = v
v = 3.6 m/s

Is that correct?
 
  • #14
Yup. Good job.

cookiemonster
 
  • #15
thanks for all the help :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
7K