Geometry-Ratios homework problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a geometry problem involving ratios and unit conversions related to the length of a scale model of a submarine. The original poster is trying to determine the correct length of the model based on a given scale of 1 inch to 16 feet for a submarine that is 560 feet long.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to set up a ratio to find the length of the model but is confused about the units involved and whether their calculations yield the correct measurement in inches or feet. Other participants question the clarity of the variable definitions and suggest ways to clarify the units in the ratio.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing guidance on how to handle the units in the ratio. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the variable definitions and the steps needed to arrive at a solution, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about the units of their answer and whether further conversion is necessary. There is also mention of previous instructions regarding formatting equations, indicating a potential gap in understanding how to present mathematical expressions clearly.

Dagenais
Messages
293
Reaction score
4
I know it is an easy problem, but I want to know if I have the answer correct.

I'm confused whether the answer is already in inches, or is still in feet.

The story problem is:

The larget submarines in the United States Navy are of the Ohio class. Each submarine is 560 feet long.

You purcahse a scale model of one of the submarines. The package states the scale of 1 inch: 16 feet. What is the length of the completed model?

So to solve, I put:

x/560ft = 1/16ft

x=35

OR is x = 420 inches? Is 35 already in inches, or is it still feet and needs to be converted (which results in 420 inches).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if you put the units on all of the terms that went into that ratio, your answer would have the units on it!
 
I did, and it is 1inch/16ft and xinches/560feet.

Doesn't help much, since I have both inches and feet.
 
Is "x" supposed to be "length of the model" or "number of inches in the length of the model"? (The way you wrote the ratio, it's the latter)


I did, and it is 1inch/16ft and xinches/560feet.

Doesn't help much, since I have both inches and feet.

Why doesn't it help? Surely you can do some sort of canceling, or if not, make some sort of substitution...
 
So I was right, 35 inches is the answer?
 
You have
[tex]\frac {1 inch} {16 ft} = \frac {x inches} {560 ft}[/tex]

when you multiply both sides by 560ft you get

[tex]{x inches} = \frac {1 inch * 560 ft} {16 ft}[/tex]


the feet cancel leaving only inches.
 
I did it on my calculator.

I completely missed that whole 2nd step. I kind of just typed in the equation in my calculator.

So 35 is right, thanks!

BTW, how did you write those equations? I recall instructions about it on the forums, before new forums were added but I can't find them.
 
click on the formulas to see the text entered to create them.

note that color does not matter.
 
P.S. IMHO, it makes it easier to understand things like this if you solve the problem by first defining your variable x as "The length of the completed model"

Then the ratio is

1 in / 16 ft = x / 560 ft

And when you solve, you're left with

x = 35 in
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K