Radio waves travel at speed of light?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the speed of radio waves, particularly their propagation time over distances and the factors that contribute to perceived delays in communication, such as SMS transmission. Participants explore the theoretical speed of electromagnetic waves compared to practical observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that radio waves, being electromagnetic waves, should travel at the speed of light, questioning why there is a noticeable delay over distances.
  • Another participant clarifies that radio waves travel at the speed of light in a vacuum, but their speed can be reduced in different media, citing the effects of permeability and permittivity.
  • A participant calculates that it should take approximately 3.33 microseconds for a radio wave to travel 1 km, suggesting that delays are not due to the speed of light itself.
  • Concerns are raised about the time delays introduced by the components in the emitter and receiver instruments, which may affect overall transmission time.
  • One participant provides an example of SMS delays, attributing them to processing times rather than the speed of light.
  • Another participant humorously suggests that delays in SMS delivery are not due to the speed of light, implying that other factors are at play.
  • There is mention of additional delays caused by signal travel through wiring and switching systems, which do not propagate signals at light speed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the causes of delays in communication, with some attributing it to physical propagation speed and others to processing and transmission factors. No consensus is reached regarding the primary source of the delays discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various factors affecting the speed of radio wave transmission, including medium properties and processing delays, but do not resolve the complexities of these interactions.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in telecommunications, physics of electromagnetic waves, and the practical implications of signal transmission delays may find this discussion relevant.

LM741
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
hi all...

Something doesn't quite add up here:

A radio wave is an electromagentic wave, right.

It therefore travels at the speed of light, right.

Then why does it actually take a finite amount time (like secoonds or even miliseconds) to travel a couple of kilometers??

mathematically, just doesn't make sense.

In theory, the time to travel a couple of km should be almost negligible!
but its not- evidently!

thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
1. They only travel at the speed of light in a vacuum, when propagating through a medium they are slowed according to the permeability and permativity of the medium.
C = 1/sqrt(Permeability * Permativity)

2. Air has nearly normal permeability and permativity so in practice they do travel a nearly the speed of light.

What specific case are you referring to?
 
LM741 said:
hi all...

Something doesn't quite add up here:

A radio wave is an electromagentic wave, right.

It therefore travels at the speed of light, right.

Then why does it actually take a finite amount time (like secoonds or even miliseconds) to travel a couple of kilometers??

mathematically, just doesn't make sense.

In theory, the time to travel a couple of km should be almost negligible!
but its not- evidently!



thanks

Let's see, the speed of light is just about 300,000 km/sec, so it should take 1/300,000 = 3.33 microseconds to travel 1 km. This is short but still an easily measurable time period. I've never heard of radio waves taking seconds or milliseconds to travel a kilometer or two.
 
Did you take into account the time delays of the components in the emitter / receiver instruments?
 
Last edited:
What are you using as an example/proof of this delay?
 
say for an example if i send an sms - it will only arrive at the receiveing host a second or two later.

i suppose these time delays are due to processing the data before transmitting it?
 
LM741 said:
say for an example if i send an sms - it will only arrive at the receiveing host a second or two later.

i suppose these time delays are due to processing the data before transmitting it?
That's one quarter of it, yes.
There's also the processing at the tower, the sending to another tower, and the processing at the receiving end.

Other than that, sure, your messages should just fly at the speed of light! :rolleyes:
 
This is really funny. Did you really think that your sms's arrive with delay because of the speed of light? Then on Christmas and New Year's Eve the light must be really slow. Hey if your friend lives on an upper floor there could be some relativistic time dilation involved when you SMS him/her. :wink:
 
antonantal said:
Did you take into account the time delays of the components in the emitter / receiver instruments?

Not only that, but in some situations the signal might have to travel through several hundred kilometres of wiring (and switching), which does not propagate signals at light speed.
 
  • #10
if only i was as knowledable as you, antonantal ...

i'm glad my desire to learn amuses you.

to think about: “Arrogance diminishes wisdom”
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K