Help with a little detail (Thermodynamics)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter timman_24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy balance in a gasoline engine running on an aqueous fuel mixture, specifically focusing on heat transfer mechanisms such as conduction and radiation within the engine's cylinder. Participants explore the feasibility of having liquid present in the cylinders and the implications of vaporization and dissociation of water in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks assistance with calculating heat transfer to the liquid in the cylinder, questioning if there is a straightforward equation for this.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about having liquid in the cylinders during operation, suggesting that radiation heat transfer can be modeled using the Stefan-Boltzmann law and conduction can be approached with Fourier's law.
  • A different participant mentions a patent claiming that water vaporizes upon entering the cylinder and is then dissociated into hydrogen and oxygen by an electric shock, expressing doubt about the practicality of this process.
  • One participant argues that the vaporization of water could occur during the intake stroke due to pressure changes, while also questioning the energy balance of the proposed dissociation process.
  • Concerns are raised about the spontaneous recombination of hydrogen and oxygen before combustion, which could lead to inefficiencies and knocking in the engine.
  • Another participant introduces the idea of using a hydrogen-producing catalyst to aid in water dissociation, while acknowledging the skepticism surrounding the overall concept.
  • A request for clarification on a specific part of an equation related to the discussion is made, indicating a need for further information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the feasibility of having liquid in the engine cylinders and the effectiveness of the proposed dissociation process. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions, such as the behavior of water under different conditions and the energy requirements for dissociation, which remain unaddressed. The discussion also reflects uncertainty regarding the practical implementation of the proposed concepts.

timman_24
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
I am working on a physics project that has to do with running a gasoline engine on an aqueous fuel mixture. I need some help on one part of my energy balance. The cylinder wall is hot in a running engine, I need to know how much of that heat energy (in kJ)is transferred to the liquid inside of the cylinder by conduction and radiation. I know I would need how long the liquid is exposed, but I don't know if there is an equation to just plug and chug.

Does anyone have an idea?

Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
Are you sure you want there to be liquid in the cylinders while the engine is running!?

I don't know of an equation for you. I imagine that the radiation part can be:

ΔErad = σT4integral{dt A(t)η(t)}

where σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (I think that's what it's called), T is the temperature (I'm assuming that the temperature doesn't change significantly over the process), A(t) is the area of the inside of the cylinder wall exposed to the fuel mixture (which can be calculated if you know what the piston position is as a function of time), and η(t) is the emissivity at the fuel mixture-cylinder wall boundary (which I don't know much about).

Then, you might want to use:

H = - k gradT

where H is the heat energy current density in the fuel mixture and k is the thermal conductivity of the fuel mixture. I imagine that this should give the conduction through a quasi-static fluid element. I have no idea bout convection.
 
Last edited:
Are you sure you want there to be liquid in the cylinders while the engine is running!?

Well it would seem that would not work very well, but the patent that I am researching says the water turns to a vapor once it hits the cylinder. The vapor then get exposed to a large electric shock and dissociates into hydrogen and oxygen which burns. I thought it was bogus from the start and the more I research it the more my first assumption seems true.

Any info on the convection?
 
Originally posted by timman_24
... the water turns to a vapor once it hits the cylinder.
This doesn't sound far-fetched to me. I'm pretty sure it would evaporate during the intake stroke if the valve was closed early enough (due to the lowering of the pressure by the expansion of the cavity).




Originally posted by timman_24
The vapor then get exposed to a large electric shock and dissociates into hydrogen and oxygen which burns.
This part smells pretty bogus to me. The electric dissociation of the water molecules will require some amount of energy. The combustion of these elements back into water will not return more energy than this amount. What is the proposed storage of this energy? A battery? Maybe it's solar? Furthermore, I'm pretty sure that the elements would want to immediately spontaneously recombine (or at least well before the completion of the compression stroke), so it doesn't sound like a very controlled process (and would probably cause a lot of knocking and such). There are a lot of details missing, though, so who knows?




Originally posted by timman_24
Any info on the convection?
No.
 
The water is also exposed to a hydrogen producing catalyst, such as nickle and platinum. This would aid in the dissociation of the water. I agree it does sound bogus, but from my research the city of reno used the process in a few of their city buses with great results.
 
Can anyone give me more information on the n(T) part of the equation that turin suggested. I have all my information except this part.

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K