Register to reply

HELP: self-locking nut run-on torque check

by stan19
Tags: check, runon, selflocking, torque
Share this thread:
stan19
#1
Mar1-07, 09:25 PM
P: 12
Hi, i would like to the correct method for self locking nut run-on torque check procedure. are we going to measure the torque to overcome friction for nut to move when 1)Fully engage which mean certain thread of bolt already exposed at the bottom of nut OR 2)Hand tighten until cannt move anymore then we measure it?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
NASA team lays plans to observe new worlds
IHEP in China has ambitions for Higgs factory
Spinach could lead to alternative energy more powerful than Popeye
wolram
#2
Mar1-07, 11:10 PM
PF Gold
wolram's Avatar
P: 3,682
Quote Quote by stan19 View Post
Hi, i would like to the correct method for self locking nut run-on torque check procedure. are we going to measure the torque to overcome friction for nut to move when 1)Fully engage which mean certain thread of bolt already exposed at the bottom of nut OR 2)Hand tighten until cannt move anymore then we measure it?
I have never allowed any extra torque for self locking nuts, but then i hardly ever use them.
Q_Goest
#3
Mar2-07, 06:18 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
Q_Goest's Avatar
P: 2,903
Hi Stan, The torque required to overcome the self locking feature of a fastener is called "prevailing torque". That torque simply resists rotation of the nut on the bolt and does nothing to increase the clamping load. If self locking nuts or bolts are used, the correct procedure is to measure this torque using a beam type or dial type torque wrench while the nut is rotating. Add that amount of torque to the torque needed to properly tighten the fastener. Bolt torque should always be measured while the nut/bolt is rotating, not when stationary.

stan19
#4
Mar4-07, 02:22 AM
P: 12
HELP: self-locking nut run-on torque check

"If self locking nuts or bolts are used, the correct procedure is to measure this torque using a beam type or dial type torque wrench while the nut is rotating"
ok, but are we going to measure that torque only after full engagement(which mean bolt end thread already protruded from bottom of nut) of nut to bolt? or......
Q_Goest
#5
Mar4-07, 08:54 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
Q_Goest's Avatar
P: 2,903
ok, but are we going to measure that torque only after full engagement(which mean bolt end thread already protruded from bottom of nut) of nut to bolt?
Hi stan. Short answer is yes. Long answer follows:

Forces which resist torque on a fastener are generally broken up into 3 categories:
1. Frictional resistance at the thread. (frictional load x moment arm = torque)
2. Frictional resistance at the nut or bolt face. (frictional load x moment arm = torque)
3. Load created within the bolt. (modeled as an inclined plane)

Modeling the bolt is generally done as if the bolt is an inclined plane, but there are differences. When you torque a bolt, you have to overcome friction at the threads as well as friction at the nut face. The remaining torque goes into 'pushing' this load up the inclined plane (so to speak). The two frictional forces are resisting that pushing force, and as it turns out, most of the torque put into a fastener goes into overcoming friction at the thread and nut/bolt face. Less than half goes into applying a clamping force. Take a look at a typical torque distribution chart here and note the amount of clamping load (they call "Thread Extension Torque") in comparison to the other two.

The point of measuring prevailing torque is to determine a fourth load that must be overcome. That load is the frictional resistance of the threads that exists without any other load on the fastener. It is strictly a function of the locking feature of the nut/bolt which resists tightening or loosening.

To answer your question then, the prevailing torque is measured with the nut and bolt fully engaged, but without any of the other three above forces resisting the torque. So you wouldn't want there to be any load on the bolt. You could even measure the prevailing torque with just the nut and bolt together with nothing in between, but that's not necessary and adds time to assembly. Note you could also measure a group, take the statistical mean, and simply add that to the total torque required. For something as simple as a fastener, you'd think the science behind them is equally simple, but this just scratches the surface. There are entire books written on the subject that cover more information about fasteners than you'd ever want to know.
stan19
#6
Mar5-07, 06:16 AM
P: 12
thank you very much
nickyfs
#7
Mar15-07, 05:28 AM
P: 4
Keep in mind that self locking nuts loose some grip every time they are removed. Every fastener on an old airplane ends up with a lot more tension than they were intended to have. This is because only one torque spec is published and mechanics aren't smart enough to compensate for used hardware.
AandPMech
#8
Jun16-08, 02:12 AM
P: 1
Quote Quote by nickyfs View Post
Keep in mind that self locking nuts loose some grip every time they are removed. Every fastener on an old airplane ends up with a lot more tension than they were intended to have. This is because only one torque spec is published and mechanics aren't smart enough to compensate for used hardware.
Just a bunch of "Grease Monkeys"?? Not "Smart Enough"...... Wow. you shouldn't be reusing self locking in the first place on aircraft. Also, most of the mechanics that I know use NEW hardware.
FredGarvin
#9
Jun16-08, 10:10 AM
Sci Advisor
FredGarvin's Avatar
P: 5,095
Quote Quote by AandPMech View Post
Just a bunch of "Grease Monkeys"?? Not "Smart Enough"...... Wow. you shouldn't be reusing self locking in the first place on aircraft. Also, most of the mechanics that I know use NEW hardware.
While not stated in the nicest or diplomatic way, the truth is that even most engineers can not tell you what bolt preload is let alone try to come up with a justification for a revised torque value for old hardware. The deign information is simply not available unless you happen to work for the airframe manufacturer. I don't think there was any intent. Then again, the poster is pretty new, so who knows. I'll give them the benefit of doubt.

You are correct though that there should not be reused hardware on a flying component of any kind. For that matter, I can't think of an application that allows self locking nuts. If a nut requires anti-rotation it should either be safety wired or cotter pinned.
elsapo1
#10
Aug4-11, 10:46 PM
P: 1
If a nut require a minimum of 16 inch pound and maximum of 155 inch pound, how do you perform the run on torque.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Why all the locking Forum Feedback & Announcements 38
Locking protocol. Forum Feedback & Announcements 12
Locking a folder? Computing & Technology 8
Check my work on torque and angular velocity Introductory Physics Homework 16
Harsh Torque problem. Check for me :o) Introductory Physics Homework 3