Where does the matter/energy go when a black hole evaporates?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the fate of matter and energy when a black hole evaporates, exploring concepts from thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, and the implications for energy conservation in the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how the first law of thermodynamics applies to black holes and the conservation of energy when they evaporate.
  • Others argue that black holes radiate energy through Hawking radiation, which allows them to return energy to the universe, thus maintaining energy conservation.
  • A participant suggests that the energy from a black hole is still part of the universe, as mass is equivalent to energy.
  • There is a discussion about the timing of radiation emission during black hole evaporation, with some expressing confusion about whether a black hole can evaporate completely before emitting all radiation.
  • Another participant explains the quantum mechanical process of particle creation near the event horizon, suggesting that one particle can escape while the other falls into the black hole, contributing to Hawking radiation.
  • Some participants challenge the clarity of the relationship between black hole evaporation and radiation emission, suggesting that these concepts are interconnected.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between black hole evaporation and radiation emission, with some asserting that they are the same process while others remain uncertain about the timing and mechanics involved. No consensus is reached on these points.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions made about energy conservation and the mechanics of radiation emission from black holes. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of quantum mechanics and thermodynamics as they apply to black holes.

garytse86
Messages
311
Reaction score
0
The first law only applies if the system is isolated, i.e. it cannot lose energy to surroundings. How then, is the total amount of energy in the universe constant?

When black holes suck in matter, you could argue that the information is still in the black hole, but black holes do evaporate, where does the matter/energy go when the black hole has evaporated? Does it mean energy is not really conserved?

Gary
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first law (of thermodynamics) includes a term Q for the heat exchange with the surroundings. This makes it also applicable to non-isolated systems.

Furthermore, when a black hole evaporates, it does so by radiating energy. This radiation is called Hawking-radiation after Stephen Hawking who first predicted it's existence, and can be explained using quantum mechanics.

So by the time the black hole has totally evaporated, it retrieved all its energy to the universe. So energy/mass conservation still holds...
 
Black holes are in the universe. Whether what is behind the event horizon is really part of the observable universe or not is a little bit semantic: a black hole has mass and mass is equivalent to energy. The energy is still in the universe.

When a black hole evaporates, the energy just dissipates into the universe.
 
oh I thought the black hole would evaporate completely before emitting all the radiation back into the universe.

Anyway how does the radiation get out of a black hole?
 
How can a black hole radiate? It sounds bizarre, considering that nothing, even light can escape from the gravitational pull of a black hole. It's a quantum mechanical (QM) effect first described by Stephen Hawking. The explanation I can give you is probably too simplistic but I think it'll ease your mind...

As predicted by QM the vacuum of space is a whirl of particles. These particles are created accompanied by its anti-particle (so not violating any preservation laws except for temporarily 'lending' some energy) and directly annihalated in a time allowed by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

When this proces of creation of particles happens near the event-horizon of a black hole, one of the particles can escape while the other falls into the black hole. So this escaping particle seems to the outside world as coming from the black hole. This is called Hawking radiation.

There is a bit of an energy problem though. The 'lend' energy must be repaid by the black hole. That's why the black hole loses energy and eventually totally evaporates.

Again, the truth is probably far more complex but I think it's a quite satisfactory explanation.
 
Originally posted by garytse86
oh I thought the black hole would evaporate completely before emitting all the radiation back into the universe.

Anyway how does the radiation get out of a black hole?
I think you're missing something key here. Your first and second sentences are talking about exactly the same thing, they are not separate issues:

A black hole evaporates by radiating its energy back into the universe.
 
but how do you know the black hole would not evaporate completely before emitting all the radiation?
 
Originally posted by garytse86
but how do you know the black hole would not evaporate completely before emitting all the radiation?
Again, you have two identical concepts that you are separating. Combine them:

A black hole evaporates because it is emitting radiation. Or put another way, the act of emitting the radiation is the evaporation. Since matter=energy, all of the mass of the black hole is lost as radiation.

Or: if you have a 1 gallon bucket and you pour 1 gallon of water out of it, is the bucket empty?

Or: if you have a 1 gallon bucket and its full, then you pour all the water out of it, how much water did you pour out?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K