## what does it mean for energy to be lost? I thought that you could not lose energy!

I got this question on a study sheet however, I am not sure if I understand, I thought that there was no such thing as a lost of energy because it can not be destroyed. However it can convert into a different type of enery. Please help me get a clue.
 PhysOrg.com physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Kenneth Wilson, Nobel winner for physics, dies>> Two collider research teams find evidence of new particle Zc(3900)>> Scientists make first direct images of topological insulator's edge currents
 Mentor Total energy should be conserved. What is the context of your question? What energies and events are we talking about?

 Quote by berkeman Total energy should be conserved. What is the context of your question? What energies and events are we talking about?
There is nothing else in this question just that.

Blog Entries: 47
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Homework Help

## what does it mean for energy to be lost? I thought that you could not lose energy!

energy can be transferred from one subsystem to another
 Recognitions: Gold Member It can also be bound into matter.
 If you aren't accounting for thermodynamics, then energy can be "lost" due to friction. That's the usual context that I'm familiar with, unless you're talking about viscous losses, but that's more or less the same deal.

Mentor
 Quote by bmack There is nothing else in this question just that.
There has to be. The answer depends on the context. Two examples:

-Your house loses energy in the winter.
-A chemical reaction (such as buring fuel in your heater) converts chemical energy to heat energy and the total energy before and after is the same.
 Recognitions: Gold Member Science Advisor Staff Emeritus Energy is conserved in a closed system. If the system is not closed energy can be lost outside the system. For example, if a mass is sliding down a slope with friction, the mass is losing energy to the slope. If you consider the mass and slope as a single system the energy is consered- the mass slows down but the slope's internal energy (temperature) increases.
 i think that what they mean by "energy being lost" is that it was turned into heat and dissapated into the ambient enviroment. in the winter, you can heat your house and then open the door and leave it open. you are losing heat but somewhere else, the temperature is gainig by a non-measureable amount.

 Quote by russ_watters There has to be. The answer depends on the context. Two examples: -Your house loses energy in the winter. -A chemical reaction (such as buring fuel in your heater) converts chemical energy to heat energy and the total energy before and after is the same.
No there isn't... that was the question on the study sheet I assumed this mean that it was never really lost it was just converted into a different type of energy. In my text book it says that energy can not be destroyed but can be converted??

 Quote by HallsofIvy Energy is conserved in a closed system. If the system is not closed energy can be lost outside the system. For example, if a mass is sliding down a slope with friction, the mass is losing energy to the slope. If you consider the mass and slope as a single system the energy is consered- the mass slows down but the slope's internal energy (temperature) increases.
okay this just sounds like energy being conserved to me ...no?
 If the question is "what does it mean for energy to be lost?" Then you basically have the right idea - it means that energy is transferred from the chief system of interest to something else. As others have pointed out, this is usually due to losses by heat (e.g. to the atmosphere).

Recognitions:
Gold Member
Staff Emeritus
 Quote by HallsofIvy Energy is conserved in a closed system. If the system is not closed energy can be lost outside the system. For example, if a mass is sliding down a slope with friction, the mass is losing energy to the slope. If you consider the mass and slope as a single system the energy is consered- the mass slows down but the slope's internal energy (temperature) increases.
 Quote by bmack okay this just sounds like energy being conserved to me ...no?
Yes, that's what I said: "If you consider the mass and slope as a single system the energy is consered- the mass slows down but the slope's internal energy (temperature) increases."

My point was that if you do NOT include the slope itself in the "system", just the sliding object, then energy in the system is lost outside the system.

 Quote by HallsofIvy Yes, that's what I said: "If you consider the mass and slope as a single system the energy is consered- the mass slows down but the slope's internal energy (temperature) increases." My point was that if you do NOT include the slope itself in the "system", just the sliding object, then energy in the system is lost outside the system.

Another way of seeing it is in terms of efficiency. Just about nothing in our practical world has 100% efficiency. Efficiency, in the case of thermodynamics and most other areas of phyics, refers to a discrepency in the input and the output of energy - the output may be less than the input, and hence it can be said that energy has been "lost" to the surroundings.
 This happens to be in keeping with what I've been wondering about, so I won't start a new thread, but if it seems like I should, someone will pipe up about it, I expect. If a brick is pushed gently in space, it will move uniformly until acted upon by an external force. If it then collides with another brick coming at it at the same speed, I know they don't suddenly stop (and now I'm thinking about it, I need to go out and find two billiard balls and roll them into each other to see what happens), and I'm imagining that they each impart kinetic energy to each other and they bounce away from each other... but I can't imagine if they're now going slower or not. Thinking back on billiards, it seems that the ball that is sent into another stationary one comes to a halt while the other one shoots off. It imparts all of its kinetic energy... Anyway, I don't know how much sense that all makes. Many thanks.
 There are different types of collisions, and energy and momentum act in different ways in different situations. Let us look at the perfectly elastic collision, in which (someone correct me if I'm wrong) both total energy and total momentum is conserved. If two bricks collide in space, for total energy to be conserved, they would both need to collide and travel back in the opposite direction at the same speed. In a perfectly inelastic collision, where only total momentum is conserved, can be exemplified by two cars of the same mass, running at the same speed which crash head on into each other. They should both come to a halt. Where does the energy go you might ask? It is dissipated in sound, heat, and in deforming the bodies of the cars. There are the in betweens as well, simply "elastic" and "inelastic" collisions, which you can go wikipedia or google if you feel so inclined :)

Recognitions:
Gold Member