Integrating 2x: Why Doesn't it Work?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DavidWi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the incorrect approach to integrating the function y = 2x to find the area between the function and the y-axis over the interval x = [0, 2]. The user, DavidWi, attempted to substitute y = 2x into the integral formula (y^2)/2, which led to an incorrect result. The correct method involves recognizing that integration must be performed with respect to the appropriate variable, and the area can be accurately calculated using the integral ∫_0^2 (2x) dx, yielding an area of 4. The importance of maintaining the relationship between dx and dy during integration is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, specifically integration.
  • Familiarity with the notation and rules of integration.
  • Knowledge of the relationship between variables in calculus (e.g., dy and dx).
  • Ability to visualize geometric interpretations of integrals, such as areas under curves.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to understand the relationship between differentiation and integration.
  • Learn about the concept of definite integrals and their applications in calculating areas.
  • Explore substitution methods in integration to handle more complex functions.
  • Practice solving integrals involving differentials to reinforce the importance of variable relationships.
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, educators teaching integration techniques, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of the principles of integration and area calculation in mathematics.

DavidWi
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Ok, I was thinking today during my calculus class about taking the integral of a function in a different way. Let's assume for a second that we want to find the area between the function and the y axis, on the interval x = [0, 2] of the function y = 2x.

What I was thinking I could do, is take the integral of y.

(y^2)/2 then substitute 2x in for y, since y = 2x.

(2x)^2 / 2

That would give us the integral between the function and the y-axis and we would be able to put in the interval for x.

But it didn't work... I got the wrong answer? Why doesn't this work? I think it should work.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by DavidWi
Ok, I was thinking today during my calculus class about taking the integral of a function in a different way. Let's assume for a second that we want to find the area between the function and the y axis, on the interval x = [0, 2] of the function y = 2x.

What I was thinking I could do, is take the integral of y.

(y^2)/2 then substitute 2x in for y, since y = 2x.

(2x)^2 / 2

That would give us the integral between the function and the y-axis and we would be able to put in the interval for x.

But it didn't work... I got the wrong answer? Why doesn't this work? I think it should work.

Thanks.
Because that isn't how integration works?

Imagine doing the same for differentiation.

we want to find d/dx of x^2, well, d/dy of y is 1, so putting y=x^2, we get d/dx(x^2)=1It just isn't right.

More formally remember integration is wrt something

so integral of ydy is not the same as integral of x^2dx when you put x^2=y because the dy and dx are there, and if y=x^2, then dy is not dx - it is 2xdx
 
y=2x and x ranges between 0 and 2.

Of course, that's simply a right triangle with base (x-axis) of length 2 and height (y-axis) of length 4: its area is (1/2)(2)(4)= 4.

You could do this as [tex]\int_0^2(ydx)= \int_0^2(2x)dx= x^2\|_0^2= 4[/tex]

You could do this as [tex]\int_0^4(xdy)= \int_0^4\frac{y}{2}dy= \frac{y^2}{4}\|_0^4= \frac{16}{4}= 4[/tex]

Your formula is wrong because you never took into account the "dx" or "dy".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K