 |
 |
What is Voltage |
 |
Apr21-07, 09:11 PM
|
#1
|
kaotak is
Posts: n/a
|
What is Voltage
What is voltage? So many words, so many explanations are just hollow echoes off the walls of "authoritative sources"
What is voltage? Why does everything electrical we see give its voltage? Does it cause current to flow? If so, how? Because of electric forces? How do we harnest the energy from our power outlets? Where are the positive and negative terminals on our power outlets? Don't all voltage drops need positive and negative terminals?
What does it really DOOOOOOOOO.
Does it give us current? If so, how?
Where does the current come from? Where do we get the energy?
Electromagnetism makes no sense.
|
|
|
|
Apr21-07, 09:24 PM
|
#2
|
interested_learner is
Offline:
Posts: 215
|
Another name for voltage is potential. In other words, potential energy. It is like being on top of a hill and current is like rolling balls off the top of the hill.
Ok not quite, but does someone have a better analogy?
|
|
|
|
Apr21-07, 09:34 PM
|
#3
|
kaotak is
Posts: n/a
|
Originally Posted by interested_learner
Another name for voltage is potential. In other words, potential energy. It is like being on top of a hill and current is like rolling balls off the top of the hill.
Ok not quite, but does someone have a better analogy?
|
Where do the balls (current) come from?
|
|
|
|
Apr22-07, 12:45 AM
|
#4
|
russ_watters is
Offline:
Posts: 16,547
|
You've used magnets before, right? You've felt the force...?
|
|
|
|
Apr22-07, 02:06 AM
|
#5
|
vanesch is
Offline:
Posts: 6,111
|
Originally Posted by kaotak
Where are the positive and negative terminals on our power outlets? [ ... ]
Electromagnetism makes no sense.
|
You've discovered a super hoax actually, but keep it quiet because there's a whole big industry living off its spread. You don't need two outlets on a power outlet, that's just to increase its price. One single outlet is quite sufficient, as long as you do a rain dance when you switch on your appliance of choice.
BTW, yes, I'm making (gently) some fun of your statements 
|
|
|
|
Apr22-07, 02:40 PM
|
#6
|
Kison is
Offline:
Posts: 7
|
voltage is another word for potential difference.
Imagine a D-sized battery. You have the positive and negative side.
Voltage describes the potential difference between the positive and negative side. This relates to the electric field & Coulomb's Law. Basically, the positive side of the battery has an unbalanced proportion of protons & electrons, and thus, when you connect a wire from the positive end to the negative, it is theorized that protons move from the positive side to the negative side. This is called electric current. However, it has been realized to be incorrect, although calculations may still be useful today.
In reality, however, electrons move from the negative side to the positive side. This idea is known as the electric flow.
So the more the voltage/potential difference, the more the positive side of the battery is unbalanced between protons/electrons in comparison to the negative side. So when you connect them with a wire, more charges will flow through the circuit every second.
|
|
|
|
Apr22-07, 04:52 PM
|
#7
|
TuviaDaCat is
Offline:
Posts: 103
|
its all theft i tell you! every electron i get from the power station i give one back to them, so what the hell am i paying for?!
|
|
|
|
Apr26-07, 12:32 AM
|
#8
|
Xezlec is
Offline:
Posts: 295
|
I like Kison's answer. But let me throw in another one. Think of the electrons in a metal as a sort of "gas" of electrons. They are free to move around in the metal, and they repel one another. If you pack more electrons into the same volume of metal, then they have a higher "pressure" because they are all repelling one another. Conversely, if you suck some electrons out, you have a "vacuum" of electrons, because the positively charged nuclei are "trying to attract more electrons". Sort of.
Now what if you build a "pump" that pumps electrons from one piece of metal to another? Well then you have a pressure that builds in one piece of metal and a vacuum that builds in the other. The vaccum piece is said to have a higher (more positive) "voltage". The voltage between two terminals is simply the difference in electron pressure between one and the other.
And if you connect some conductive path (wire) between the two, the electrons will zoom from the higher pressure to the lower pressure, through that path. The bigger the pressure difference (voltage), the faster they will whiz through the path. The rate that the electrons zip through that path is called the "current", and is measured in Amperes. So current through a path is proportional to voltage. Want more?
|
|
|
|
Apr26-07, 12:57 AM
|
#9
|
Coto is
Offline:
Posts: 188
|
In other words one prong of the plug is +'ve and the other -'ve... and the third round one (american outlet) is the ground.
|
|
|
|
Apr26-07, 01:04 AM
|
#10
|
cesiumfrog is
Offline:
Posts: 1,925
|
Originally Posted by Coto
In other words one prong of the plug is +'ve and the other -'ve... and the third round one (american outlet) is the ground.
|
That's only true for about a hundreth of a second.
|
|
|
|
Apr26-07, 01:07 AM
|
Last edited by Coto; Apr26-07 at 01:10 AM..
#11
|
Coto is
Offline:
Posts: 188
|
ok ok.. AC.. but for simplicities sake. Plus isn't it then 60Hz AC?
|
|
|
|
Apr26-07, 10:15 PM
|
#12
|
Xezlec is
Offline:
Posts: 295
|
Originally Posted by Coto
ok ok.. AC.. but for simplicities sake. Plus isn't it then 60Hz AC?
|
In some places it's 50 Hz. Each cycle is one polarity for exactly half the time. That's 1/100 second.
|
|
|
|
Apr26-07, 11:24 PM
|
Last edited by cesiumfrog; Apr26-07 at 11:26 PM..
#13
|
cesiumfrog is
Offline:
Posts: 1,925
|
Coto, my statement applies regardless of whether your power grid supplies 50Hz or 60Hz (I presume the US uses the latter, and wonder if it's related to their anti-metric stance). My wording was that good.  People these days depend too much on calculators - they pick them up too early (before they've rearranged and properly simplified the algebra) and then hang on to them for too long (trusting the 9 digit precision regardless of lower certainty in initial data). </rant>
|
|
|
|
Apr26-07, 11:44 PM
|
#14
|
Coto is
Offline:
Posts: 188
|
Actually what I was implying was AC power versus DC power (in my first statement). The second statement was only questioning the 1/100th of a second, where Xezlec seems to have answered it, but it appears you disagree with his answer.. so I'm confused 0_o, are you disagreeing with my question? with my first statement? or did you mean Xezlec?
Plus, I think you're over generalizing how people plug and chug numbers too often in their calculator.. depends who the person is and what they've studied. Personally I haven't had to deal with a calculator since 2nd year.. we have no choice but to simplify algebraically.. that or we get the answer wrong.
|
|
|
|
Apr27-07, 11:53 AM
|
#15
|
Xezlec is
Offline:
Posts: 295
|
Lively little conversation.
cesiumfrog: 1/120 sec is more than 10% different from 1/100 sec. When people say "about", I sometimes assume they mean within +/- 10% or so. I think it was "about" as reasonable of me to assume you meant specifically 50 Hz as it would have been for me to assume you intended your statement to cover 60 Hz. ;-)
As for calculators, I think whatever is faster is better (I'm an engineer). People who use their calculators earlier in the process almost always get done quicker than people who feel the need to get everything nice and perfect and reduced first. And I don't even reduce algebraically anymore. Waste of time -- my calculator's algebra system is better at reducing than I am, and makes far fewer mistakes!
On tests in school, I used to always get the problems right conceptually, and make errors in the algebra on almost every problem. I recognized this tendency, so I would go over and over and over my work to make sure I didn't screw up, being as careful as possible. But I still made algebra mistakes half the time, just because of all the eye-boggling formulas dancing in front of me (and no, I'm not dyslexic, just clumsy). My TI-82 turned me into an excellent and functional engineer. And I got an even better calc later.
So there. :-)
|
|
|
|
Apr29-07, 12:15 AM
|
#16
|
mr200backstrok is
Offline:
Posts: 27
|
Xezlec-
I have been trying to understand volts for the last year. Reading through multitudes of definitions (including one thread for about 45 minutes just now) did not do for me what your description did in about 45 seconds.
one question: do the electrons actually travel faster? or is it just that more of them flow? if the latter is true, how fast do electrons flow?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|