
#1
May1107, 09:59 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 4,768

There's a "theorem" in my book that says if x is a cluster point of {x_n}, then lim inf(x_n)[itex]\leq[/itex]x[itex]\leq[/itex]lim sup(x_n).
The way the author proves it is a little bit extravagant. Why not just say "Let A be the set of all cluster points. Then, lim inf(x_n)=inf(A)[itex]\leq[/itex]x[itex]\leq[/itex]sup(A)=lim sup(x_n)." ??? 



#2
May1307, 03:10 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,178

Don't they pretty much say the same thing?



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Limsup h.w. proofs  Calculus & Beyond Homework  1  
limsup and liminf  Calculus  13  
analysis..limsup(inf) sinn^1/n = ? it`s not easy..  Calculus  7  
help with liminf and limsup  Calculus & Beyond Homework  1  
Another limsup and lim inf question  Calculus  2 