Register to reply

NSD Fusion GmbH?

by mheslep
Tags: fusion, gmbh
Share this thread:
mheslep
#1
May16-07, 03:21 PM
PF Gold
P: 3,103
Can anyone expound on product/design approach of the neutron-generator company NSD-Fusion GmbH?
http://www.nsd-fusion.com/core-tech.php

I'm guessing this is a spin off of the attempt by Daimler-Chrysler & G. Miley to build inertial electrostatic based N generators a few years back. Here they list N flux at 10^8 N/sec w/ D-T fusion:
http://www.nsd-fusion.com/14mev.php
I'm recalling from somewhere that the Daimler-C people thought one needed ~10^12 N/sec (~1 Watt) to make a commercially viable device, and it probably needed to be D-D.

AFAICT, of all the N gen. firms - Schlumberger, BakerHughes, Thermo Scientific, - NSD Fusion is the only one attempting a go w/ a renewable, accelerator based fusion scheme.

Any comments? My particular interest is in explosives detection.

Mark
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
'Office life' of bacteria may be their weak spot
Lunar explorers will walk at higher speeds than thought
Philips introduces BlueTouch, PulseRelief control for pain relief
Astronuc
#2
May16-07, 07:52 PM
Admin
Astronuc's Avatar
P: 21,915
Looks like an IEC - in cylindrical geometry - as opposed to a 'fusor' in spherical geometry.

Basically a [fast] neutron source for neutron radiography, or if thermalized, for neutron activation analysis.

D-D systems produced a lower level of 14 MeV n's, and one doesn't have to worry so much about T, although the D-D reaction produces T + p in ~50% of the reactions, and the T will more likely react with a D than D-D for a given energy.

D+D has a much lower reaction rate parameter the D+T, by almost 2 orders of magnitude at T ~ 50-70 keV, D+T would provide a greater neutron yield at lower energy input.
mheslep
#3
May16-07, 09:20 PM
PF Gold
P: 3,103
Quote Quote by Astronuc View Post
...

D+D has a much lower reaction rate parameter the D+T, by almost 2 orders of magnitude at T ~ 50-70 keV, D+T would provide a greater neutron yield at lower energy input.
Yes. T would also add cost/complexity for a commercial product: T is controlled, licensed & therefore expensive; D is not.

Mark

Astronuc
#4
May17-07, 05:14 AM
Admin
Astronuc's Avatar
P: 21,915
NSD Fusion GmbH?

But if one wants 14.1 MeV neutrons, one must use D+T. Also, D+T has been historically used in 'neutron-howitzers'. The deuterons are accelerated into a tritiated source (metal hydride).


Register to reply

Related Discussions
C60 + DT = Fusion? High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 2
Fusion in sun Cosmology 6
Dt fusion and dd fusion High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 1
Indian scientist who claimed to have caused cold fusion in a lab Nuclear Engineering 23
Hot fusion General Physics 0