| Thread Closed |
Abstract Algebra question |
Share Thread |
| Jun6-07, 12:52 PM | #1 |
|
|
Abstract Algebra question
This question links to a former discussion on the board. I'm confused regarding this thread:
http://http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=3622 Specifically, towards the end of the thread, the asker states (in regards to the union notation originally cited): "....if we say that x is an element of the union of those sets, then we know x is an element of at least one of those sets. " I thought the "or" conditional of the union meant that one (and only one) match occurs for x for the notation to be true. I could be wrong....
|
| Jun6-07, 01:14 PM | #2 |
|
|
Nope. "Or" always means non-exclusive or.
|
| Jun6-07, 01:43 PM | #3 |
|
|
Got it, thanks....
|
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: Abstract Algebra question
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| abstract algebra question | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 5 | ||
| Abstract Algebra -- isomorphism question | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 4 | ||
| abstract algebra question | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 7 | ||
| Another Abstract Algebra Question.... | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 1 | ||
| Abstract Algebra question? | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 13 | ||